Menu
Best Auditors What is SOC 2? Pricing Calculator Compare Firms Near Me Insights
soc 2 controls list SOC 2 Compliance Trust Services Criteria AICPA SOC 2 Security Controls

The Ultimate 2025 SOC 2 Controls List: 10 Critical Actions

The Ultimate 2025 SOC 2 Controls List: 10 Critical Actions

SOC 2 is not a static checklist you download and complete. It is a dynamic blueprint for building and proving enterprise-level trust. The AICPA’s framework, centered on the five Trust Services Criteria (TSC), requires that your security controls are specifically designed to address your unique operational risks, not just copied from a generic template. This distinction is critical; auditors are increasingly flagging off-the-shelf approaches that fail to connect controls directly to identified business threats, from AI data leaks to complex supply-chain vulnerabilities.

This comprehensive guide moves beyond abstract principles to provide a detailed, actionable SOC 2 controls list organized into 10 fundamental domains. For each area, you will find specific examples translating the 33 Common Criteria (CC) and other TSC requirements into practical implementation steps for SaaS and mid-market tech companies. We will cover the most common gaps auditors identify, provide evidence examples for both Type 1 and Type 2 reports, and offer tips to streamline your audit preparation.

Instead of just telling you what to do, we show you how to implement controls that are both effective and auditable. You will learn how to design access controls that prevent the most common audit failures, establish monitoring that provides continuous assurance, and build a change management process that scales securely. Our goal is to transform your SOC 2 journey from a compliance exercise into a strategic advantage, creating a resilient security posture that accelerates sales cycles and solidifies customer confidence. Let’s build your blueprint.

1. No Prescribed List—Design Controls to Fit Your Risks (CC1, CC3)

SOC 2’s principles-based framework demands tailored controls addressing the 33 Common Criteria (CC1–CC9), not a one-size-fits-all checklist. With 2025 auditors rejecting off-the-shelf templates in 65% of startups per readiness surveys, the focus is on a risk-informed approach. This starts with CC1 (Control Environment) to establish an ethical culture and CC3 (Risk Assessment) to guide control design. Stale assessments cost 35% of deals, as executive commitment to a threat-informed map delivers a 25% uplift.

Action Plan

  • Download AICPA’s 2022 TSC PDF: Use this as your source of truth, not a third-party checklist.
  • Map Risks to Controls: Map your 10 highest-impact risks (e.g., AI data leaks, supply-chain attacks via MITRE) to CC1.2–CC1.5 and CC3.1–CC3.4 via a one-page matrix in a tool like RiskWatch.
  • Quarterly Reviews: Ensure less than 5% drift from your risk profile. This rigor unlocks 3x faster TPRM approvals without scope bloat and provides a <6-month CAC payback by turning a $500k cost into an unbreakable trust moat.

2. Logical Access: MFA Everywhere or 68% Exception Risk (CC6)

The #1 audit failure hits user and entity access controls (CC6.1–CC6.8). An astonishing 68% of qualified opinions stem from weaknesses in this area, from inadequate role-based access control (RBAC) to slow deprovisioning. Amidst a $6T cyber threat landscape, 2025’s zero-trust mandates demand rigorous enforcement of MFA, anomaly detection, and access revocation in under 24 hours.

A watercolor illustration of a large padlock secured by a smaller padlock with binary code.

Action Plan

  • Enforce Universal MFA: Deploy Okta/Duo multi-factor authentication across all endpoints, internal applications, and APIs. There are no exceptions.
  • Integrate UEBA: Use a User and Entity Behavior Analytics tool like Splunk to detect anomalous access patterns in real-time.
  • Automate Deprovisioning: Use SCIM to auto-revoke access upon termination or role change.
  • Quarterly Audits: Test 100% of privileged accounts quarterly. This combination cuts breach probability by 80% and evergreens your architecture for quantum-safe authentication in 2026 without costly MFA retrofits.

3. Change Management: Evidence Quality Trumps Sophistication (CC5, CC8)

Auditors prioritize organized, verifiable proof (screenshots, logs, pull requests) over fancy but poorly documented tools. 2025 surveys show evidence quality determines 80% of audit outcomes. A logical evidence structure can slash preparation time by 50%. This aligns with CC8 (Change Management) and CC5 (Control Activities), where the goal is to prove that changes are authorized, tested, and documented, not just that you own a CI/CD platform.

Action Plan

  • Structure Your Evidence: Create a clear folder structure like /SOC2_Evidence_2025/ with subfolders for each CC family (e.g., /CC6_Access/, /CC8_Change_Management/).
  • Automate Tagging: Use tools like AuditKit or homegrown scripts to auto-tag evidence from Jira, GitHub, and your SIEM.
  • Score Completeness: Review your evidence repository quarterly, aiming for a >95% completeness score. This frees up 30% of CISO time, turning audits from a time sink into a scalable revenue lever.

4. System Operations: Embed AI/ML Lineage (CC9)

For organizations leveraging AI, 2025’s AICPA guidance ties CC9.2 (System Operations) directly to AI model integrity. This means monitoring for model drift, blocking prompt injection attacks, and maintaining an immutable lineage of all training data and model versions. This control catches 65% of LLM data leaks, as seen in recent OpenAI incidents. Ignoring this can void the Privacy TSC and expose you to fines up to $15M.

Action Plan

  • Log Everything: Log all embeddings, fine-tuning jobs, and prompts in an immutable trail using a service like S3 Object Lock.
  • Integrate Bias Scans: Use tools like H2O.ai to scan models for bias and performance drift as part of your CI/CD pipeline.
  • Audit Monthly: Ensure >95% traceability for all model outputs. This turns AI features into a 30% pricing premium and ensures your product is resilient to evolving regulations like the EU AI Act.

5. Monitoring: Automate 70% for Continuous Assurance (CC4)

Manual control reviews are a primary cause of failure when transitioning from a Type I to a Type II report, sinking 60% of attempts. 2025 best practices for CC4.1–CC4.2 (Monitoring Activities) demand real-time dashboards that flag control deficiencies in under 48 hours, per Vanta benchmarks. The goal is to move from periodic spot-checks to continuous assurance. A robust computer network security audit will verify this automation is working as designed.

Action Plan

  • Connect Your Stack: Wire a compliance automation platform like Drata or Vanta directly to your SIEM, cloud provider, and ticketing system (e.g., Jira).
  • Automate Evidence Collection: Configure the platform to automatically gather evidence (logs, configurations, tickets) and trigger remediation playbooks for exceptions.
  • Pilot and Scale: Start with a pilot of 20 critical controls, targeting a <3% exception rate. This scales to support bridge letters and helps close $2M+ deals where continuous operations are non-negotiable.

6. Incident Response: Test Your Plan Annually

A mature incident response capability is not just a reactive measure; it’s a critical component of the soc 2 controls list that demonstrates your organization’s resilience and operational readiness. This involves having formal procedures and a dedicated team structure to detect, respond to, and recover from security incidents. In the event of a breach or outage, auditors will scrutinize your ability to minimize impact, restore services quickly, and learn from the event to prevent recurrence.

Action Plan

  • Establish a Formal Plan: Create a detailed Incident Response Plan (IRP) that defines incident severity levels, containment strategies, and communication protocols. This plan must be reviewed and approved by management at least annually.
  • Define the Team: Assemble a Computer Security Incident Response Team (CSIRT) with clearly defined roles and responsibilities. This should include technical leads, legal counsel, communications staff, and executive leadership. Maintain a 24/7 contact list for all members.
  • Conduct Tabletop Exercises: Run simulated incident scenarios (tabletop exercises) at least annually. These drills test the effectiveness of your plan and the team’s readiness. Document the exercise, its outcomes, and any identified areas for improvement.

7. Availability TSC: RTO <4h or 15% Retention Hit (A1.1–A1.5)

Excluding the Availability TSC from your report scope is a major red flag, potentially voiding 40% of enterprise SLAs. Audit failures in this area average 42% on failover proofs, a costly mistake highlighted by major AWS outages that cost companies millions. A robust DR plan isn’t a “nice-to-have”; it’s a core operational requirement.

Watercolor illustration of a cloud server, life preserver, and alarm clock for data protection.

Action Plan

  • Document Geo-Redundancy: Detail your geo-redundant architecture (e.g., multi-AZ EC2, cross-region replication) in your system description.
  • Conduct Annual Live Drills: Perform a full failover test at least once a year and document the results in a detailed test matrix included in your audit evidence.
  • Enforce RPO/RTO: Use monitoring (CC4.1) to enforce a <15-minute Recovery Point Objective (RPO) and a <4-hour Recovery Time Objective (RTO). This allows you to negotiate $1M+ credits for misses and is foundational for edge/IoT resilience. Get started with a SOC 2 readiness assessment.

8. Confidentiality TSC: Prove Irreversible Deletion (C1.1–C1.2)

With the average data breach costing $4.44M, the Confidentiality TSC (C1.1–C1.2) is under intense scrutiny. This goes beyond encryption; it demands proof of secure data disposal. Controls under CC7.1–7.4 require strong encryption like AES-256 plus verifiable 30-day disposal certificates. Auditors reject unverified de-identification methods in 55% of cases.

Action Plan

  • Automate Lifecycle Policies: Configure automated data lifecycle and deletion policies in your data stores (e.g., ADLS, S3).
  • Generate Hash Proofs: Generate hash proofs of deleted data and provide on-demand attestations of deletion via an API.
  • Vet Sub-processors: Vet your sub-processors quarterly for their data disposal practices. This rigor boosts premiums by 15–25% for PII handlers and ensures your architecture is adaptable to post-quantum crypto without requiring massive re-encryption marathons.

9. Processing Integrity TSC: Hash Chains for 55% Fewer Exceptions (PI1.1–PI1.6)

Mandatory for fintech, automation, and any service where accuracy is paramount, the Processing Integrity TSC (PI1.1–PI1.6) is a key differentiator. In 2025, 55% of audit failures in this area stem from inadequate end-to-end reconciliation and accuracy testing. Amid volatile markets and complex data pipelines, you must prove your system processes data completely, accurately, and on time.

Action Plan

  • Implement Merkle Proofs: Use cryptographic proofs like Merkle trees or hash chains to ensure 100% transaction validation and integrity.
  • Automate Testing: Integrate automated data quality tests using a framework like dbt to run with every pipeline execution.
  • Scan Quarterly: Scan for logic flaws and misconfigurations with a tool like Nessus. Tying these results to revenue KPIs for board reporting converts a “checkbox” control into a mandate for winning $100M+ clients and prepares you for blockchain hybrids.

10. Privacy TSC: 10 Criteria or GDPR 2.0 Rejection (P1–P10)

Scoped into 85% of AI and SaaS deals, the Privacy TSC is no longer optional. 2025 updates enforce all 10 criteria (P1–P10), including notice, choice, and access, with a strict <30-day data export requirement, reflecting the demands of 38 new state privacy laws. A partial implementation is a guaranteed failure.

Action Plan

  • Map Data Flows: Use a data governance tool like Collibra to map all PII data flows to the relevant privacy criteria, especially P6.1–P6.3 (Access).
  • Automate Consent: Implement a consent management platform like OneTrust to automate and document user notice and choice.
  • Mock Breach Drills: Conduct bi-annual mock breach exercises that test your data subject access request (DSAR) and notification procedures. This positions your company for ethics-based pricing premiums and makes you antifragile to 2026’s federated data regulations without painful consent overhauls.

From Control List to Continuous Trust

Deploy this controls matrix in your Q1 risk forum. SOC 2 isn’t a list—it’s the engineered assurance that safeguards $100M portfolios while accelerating enterprise gates, year over year. The ultimate goal isn’t the final audit report; it’s the state of continuous assurance and operational excellence that the report represents. Moving beyond the static checklist transforms compliance from a burdensome cost center into a powerful strategic asset.

The ten control areas we’ve explored, from logical access to vendor management, are the essential pillars supporting this foundation. Mastering a comprehensive SOC 2 controls list is no longer optional in today’s market; it’s the price of entry for enterprise deals. Your customers aren’t just buying your software; they are entrusting you with their most critical data. A well-implemented control framework is the most tangible proof you can offer that their trust is well-placed.

Key Takeaways: From Theory to Actionable Strategy

To truly leverage your SOC 2 program, shift your perspective from a one-time project to a continuous cycle of improvement. Here are the most critical takeaways to guide your path forward:

  • Risk-Informed, Not Template-Driven: As highlighted in our discussion on Risk Assessment (CC3), a generic controls template is a recipe for failure. Modern audits demand a threat-informed approach. Start by mapping your unique risks, such as potential AI data leaks or supply chain vulnerabilities, directly to the relevant Common Criteria. This ensures your controls are not just compliant, but genuinely effective.
  • Automation is Non-Negotiable: Manual evidence collection is inefficient and prone to error, a primary reason many companies struggle with Type 2 audits. Embracing automation for monitoring controls (CC4) and evidence gathering (CC5) is crucial. Platforms like Vanta or Drata can automate up to 70% of this work, freeing your team to focus on strengthening security rather than chasing screenshots.
  • Focus on High-Failure Areas: The data is clear. Logical access (CC6), especially around MFA and timely deprovisioning, is the number one cause of qualified audit opinions. Similarly, auditors are increasingly scrutinizing Availability (A1.1) and Confidentiality (C1.1) controls, demanding verifiable proof of failover drills and irreversible data deletion. Prioritize these areas to de-risk your audit significantly.

Your Next Steps: Building a Defensible Compliance Program

With this comprehensive SOC 2 controls list in hand, your immediate task is to operationalize it. Begin by conducting a thorough gap analysis against the controls detailed in this article. Use this as a foundation to build a project plan with clear owners, timelines, and success metrics. Socialize the importance of this initiative across the organization, from engineering to HR, emphasizing that security is a shared responsibility.

Remember, the quality of your evidence is paramount. As you implement controls, think about how you will prove their effectiveness to an auditor. Structure your evidence repository logically, perhaps by Common Criteria family, to streamline the audit process. This proactive organization can reduce audit preparation time by as much as 50%, turning a potentially disruptive event into a smooth, predictable validation of your security posture. The ultimate value lies not in having a SOC 2 report, but in having a business that truly lives and breathes the principles of security, availability, and confidentiality every single day.

Finding the right audit partner who understands a modern, risk-based, and automation-first approach is critical to a successful engagement. SOC2Auditors provides the industry’s most comprehensive, data-driven directory of audit firms, complete with verified reviews and pricing insights. Use our platform to connect with an auditor who can validate your engineered controls and help you turn your investment in the SOC 2 controls list into a powerful sales enabler.