Menu
What is SOC 2 compliance software for fintech? Platforms that automate evidence collection and continuous control monitoring across SOC 2, PCI-DSS, and SOX simultaneously — not just a generic SOC 2 checklist. Fintech-grade tools cover multi-year evidence retention for banking partner audits, change-management controls under SOX SDLC requirements, and PCI-DSS scope mapping from a single dashboard.
Your banking partner just asked for a SOC 2 Type 2 report, a PCI-DSS attestation of compliance, and quarterly evidence exports — by next quarter. Your state DFI follows up with its own information security questionnaire. A Fortune 500 enterprise customer adds a rider requiring semi-annual audit refreshes.
This is the fintech compliance reality. It is not a one-time certification project.
The stakes are concrete. IBM’s 2025 Cost of a Data Breach report puts the average breach cost in financial services at $6.08 million — second only to healthcare. 70–85% of enterprise RFPs require SOC 2. Among Fortune 500 procurement teams, 98% mandate Type 2 specifically. And banking partners increasingly require annual or semi-annual audit refreshes, not just a one-time report.
Generic SOC 2 software was built for a SaaS company doing one audit a year. That is not your situation. This guide covers the six platforms that actually fit the fintech compliance workload — multi-framework, continuous, and built for the scrutiny you face.
For a deeper look at the full compliance picture, see our guide to SOC 2 for fintech companies and the broader SOC 2 software hub.
Why Fintech Needs More Than Generic SOC 2 Software
The difference is not just scope. It is frequency and consequence.
A standard B2B SaaS company passes SOC 2 Type 2, posts the report to its trust portal, and moves on. A neobank, payment processor, lending platform, or BaaS provider operates under a different set of pressures.
Regulatory scrutiny is layered. The SEC, CFPB, and state DFIs each have their own information security expectations. Sponsor banks run their own vendor audits on top of whatever certifications you hold. None of them accept “we passed SOC 2 last year” as a complete answer.
PCI-DSS is not optional if you touch card data. If your platform stores, processes, or transmits cardholder data, PCI-DSS compliance is mandatory — and the QSA assessment runs in parallel with your SOC 2 cycle. The control overlap is real (firewall configs, access controls, vulnerability management), but managing both in separate spreadsheets is how evidence gaps appear.
SOX is coming if you’re pre-IPO. SOX Section 404 internal controls over financial reporting require documented change management, segregation of duties evidence, and IT general controls. Your SDLC process — who approved what code change, in what sequence — needs to be auditable. That is the “four-eyes” principle, and it has to live somewhere that produces clean evidence.
Banking partner audits happen on their schedule, not yours. Semi-annual evidence requests from a sponsor bank mean your compliance program needs to be live, not assembled at audit time. You need continuous monitoring and multi-year evidence retention, not a once-a-year evidence dump.
Generic SOC 2 platforms handle the AICPA Trust Services Criteria well. The ones ranked below handle SOC 2 plus the layer underneath it.
What We Ranked On
Five criteria matter specifically for fintech:
- Multi-framework depth — genuine SOC 2 + PCI-DSS + SOX + ISO 27001 coverage, with control cross-mapping that actually reduces duplicate work
- Evidence retention — multi-year audit trails for banking partner requests, not just the current observation period
- Change-management integration — SDLC controls, deploy approvals, and segregation of duties evidence for SOX and SOC 2 CC8.1
- Continuous monitoring — daily or real-time control tests that produce clean evidence without manual snapshots before each audit
- Auditor marketplace or in-house QSA — access to auditors with fintech experience, especially firms that can handle PCI-DSS QSA work
The 6 Best Platforms for Fintech SOC 2 Compliance
#1 Drata — Best Multi-Framework Depth
Drata is the strongest all-around choice for a Series A–C fintech running SOC 2 + PCI-DSS simultaneously. Its control mapping spans 26+ frameworks, and the SOC 2/PCI-DSS overlap is well-implemented — evidence collected for SOC 2 CC6.1 (access controls) automatically maps to PCI DSS Requirement 7, and vulnerability scan results feed both frameworks without duplicate uploads. The Forrester Total Economic Impact study of Drata found a 78% reduction in audit and data-collection time, cutting roughly 980 annual hours to 220. For a fintech team managing two audit cycles a year, that is significant.
Fintech-specific strengths: strong change-management controls for CC8.1, pull-request-level evidence collection from GitHub and GitLab, and pre-built SOX control mappings for pre-IPO teams. The platform’s continuous monitoring runs daily automated tests across 300+ integrations — AWS, Okta, Jira, Stripe, and others. Evidence is retained with full timestamps, which matters when a banking partner asks for a 24-month access-review history.
2026 pricing: $7,500–$15,000/year at startup tier; $15,000–$30,000 for growth-stage; $25,000–$50,000+ for enterprise multi-framework programs. Quote-based. Auditor fees separate.
Framework coverage: SOC 2, PCI-DSS, SOX mappings, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, and 20+ others.
Honest downside: Drata’s breadth means configuration takes time. Getting PCI-DSS scope correctly defined requires hands-on setup — you cannot just flip it on and expect clean evidence. Plan for 2–4 weeks of integration work before your first evidence export is usable.
For the full breakdown, see our Drata review.
#2 Vanta — Largest Integration Library, Strong Fintech Customer Base
Vanta has more fintech customers in its reference list than any other platform. Ramp, Modern Treasury, and a long list of Series B–D fintechs use it. The integration library is the widest in the category at 400+, which matters when your stack includes bespoke core banking connectors alongside standard cloud services. An IDC study of Vanta customers reported 526% three-year ROI, 82% less time on audits, and a 3-month payback period.
For fintech, Vanta’s auditor marketplace is a meaningful differentiator. It connects you with vetted CPA firms directly inside the platform — including firms with specific fintech experience — and the evidence-sharing workflow is built for the back-and-forth that happens during a Type 2 observation period. The platform covers SOC 2, PCI-DSS, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and SOX-relevant controls. The SOX coverage is pre-IPO oriented, not full SOX 404 management, but it handles the SDLC and IT general controls layer that most fintechs need.
2026 pricing: $10,000–$15,000/year at startup tier; $25,000–$50,000 for mid-market; $50,000–$80,000+ for enterprise. Quote-based.
Framework coverage: SOC 2, PCI-DSS, ISO 27001, HIPAA, SOX-relevant controls, GDPR.
Honest downside: Vanta’s PCI-DSS module is solid for automation but does not include a QSA. You will still need to hire a separate QSA for the Report on Compliance. If bundling the QSA matters to your procurement timeline, look at Thoropass.
Full breakdown: Vanta review.
#3 Thoropass — Best Bundled Audit + PCI QSA
Thoropass is the only platform on this list that is itself a Qualified Security Assessor Company (QSAC). That is the key fact. Your SOC 2 audit, your PCI DSS Report on Compliance — across Levels 1 through 4 — and the compliance platform all come from one vendor with the formal credentials to perform each assessment. The in-house team includes a PCAOB-registered CPA firm for SOC 2 and certified ASV scans plus penetration testing for PCI. No other GRC platform in this category holds QSAC status.
The fintech case for Thoropass is straightforward: if your audit timeline is tight and you do not want to coordinate between a compliance platform, a SOC 2 CPA firm, and a separate PCI QSA, bundling under Thoropass removes two of those relationships. The software handles multi-framework control mapping, continuous monitoring, and evidence packaging. The in-house assessors perform the attestation.
2026 pricing: Bundled with audit services. Pricing is custom-quoted and includes platform + audit fees combined. Expect the all-in cost to be higher than a platform-only subscription but lower than buying a platform and two separate audit engagements.
Framework coverage: SOC 2, PCI-DSS (with in-house QSA), ISO 27001, HIPAA.
Honest downside: You are committing to Thoropass as both software vendor and auditor. If you ever want to switch auditors, you lose the platform integration too. For fintechs with existing auditor relationships they value, this is a real constraint.
See also: Thoropass review.
#4 AuditBoard — Best for Pre-IPO and Public Fintechs Needing SOX + SOC 2
AuditBoard was built for internal audit teams, not just compliance managers. That distinction matters when you are a pre-IPO fintech 12–18 months from an S-1, or a public company managing SOX 404 alongside SOC 2. The platform has a dedicated SOX module with ITGC (IT General Controls) management, control testing workflows, deficiency tracking, and board-level reporting. SOC 2 runs in the same environment, so your internal audit team is not switching tools.
For fintech specifically: AuditBoard handles the change-management and segregation-of-duties documentation that SOX Section 404 requires, cross-maps those controls to SOC 2 CC8.1 and CC6.3, and produces the executive-level risk dashboards that your CFO and audit committee need to see. The SOC 2 Type 2 report lives alongside your SOX workpapers in one system.
2026 pricing: Enterprise-focused. Quote-based. Expect $50,000–$100,000+ annually for a full SOX + SOC 2 implementation. Not suited for seed or Series A budgets.
Framework coverage: SOC 2, SOX (full Section 404), ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, NIST, CMMC.
Honest downside: AuditBoard is heavy. Implementation takes months. A Series B fintech without a dedicated internal audit function will find it over-engineered. It is the right tool once you have a VP of Internal Audit or a GRC team — not before.
#5 Secureframe — Best for Mid-Market Fintechs Wanting Expert Guidance
Secureframe’s differentiator is its compliance expert team, many of whom are former auditors. For a fintech that does not have an in-house CISO and is managing its first SOC 2 Type 2 alongside PCI-DSS scope definition, having a named compliance expert who has sat on the auditor side is worth a lot. They flag the evidence gaps that trip up first-time fintech audits before they become findings.
The platform covers SOC 2, PCI-DSS, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR with strong automation across 300+ integrations. Evidence collection, policy management, vendor risk workflows, and continuous monitoring are all present. The expert-guidance layer is what separates it from a self-serve tool.
2026 pricing: $10,000–$35,000/year at the lower end; $35,000–$60,000 for growth-stage multi-framework programs. Quote-based.
Framework coverage: SOC 2, PCI-DSS, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR.
Honest downside: The expert-guidance model means your timeline depends on Secureframe’s team capacity. During peak audit seasons, response times can slow. If you need to move fast and independently, a more self-serve platform like Drata or Vanta may serve you better.
Full breakdown: Secureframe review.
#6 Aptible — Best for Fintech Infrastructure with PCI Attestation
Aptible is the only option on this list that itself holds a PCI DSS Service Provider Level 2 attestation at the infrastructure layer. For a fintech building payment rails, a PayFac model, or sponsor-bank-facing infrastructure, that means the hardest part of your PCI assessment — the underlying hosting environment — is already attested. You still need your own PCI RoC or SAQ for your application layer, but the infrastructure controls inherit from Aptible’s attestation automatically.
Aptible is not a GRC platform. It is a managed Platform-as-a-Service for regulated workloads. Dedicated Stacks inherit PCI infrastructure controls by default, and Aptible publishes detailed documentation showing exactly which PCI DSS requirements are covered. Most fintechs run Aptible alongside Drata or Vanta — Aptible handles the infrastructure half of PCI and SOC 2 evidence; the GRC platform handles policies, vendor risk, and administrative controls.
Fintech-specific strengths: PCI DSS Service Provider Level 2 attestation, dedicated stacks for sensitive workloads, inherited controls for encryption, logging, vulnerability scanning, and backup. Published documentation mapping infrastructure controls to PCI DSS requirements.
2026 pricing: Resource-based, starts around $499 per month for the Production plan. Dedicated Stacks for PCI-scoped workloads priced higher.
Framework coverage: PCI DSS Service Provider Level 2 (infrastructure), SOC 2, HIPAA, HITRUST (infrastructure). Pair with a GRC tool for administrative controls.
Honest downside: Aptible only covers the infrastructure layer. You still need a compliance platform for policies, workforce training, and administrative safeguards. The win is that your GRC subscription can be cheaper — a Sprinto or Drata plan at the lower tier pairs well when Aptible is handling the infrastructure half of the workload.
Platform Comparison Table
| Platform | SOC 2 | PCI-DSS | SOX Mappings | ISO 27001 | 2026 Price Range | Best-for Segment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drata | Full | Full | Pre-IPO ITGC | Full | $7.5K–$50K+ | Series A–C, multi-framework |
| Vanta | Full | Full | Pre-IPO ITGC | Full | $10K–$80K+ | Scaling fintechs, large integration needs |
| Thoropass | Full + in-house CPA | Full + in-house QSA (QSAC) | Partial | Full | Bundled, custom | Fintechs wanting software + SOC 2 audit + PCI QSA under one roof |
| AuditBoard | Full | Full | Full SOX 404 | Full | $50K–$100K+ | Pre-IPO, public fintechs, internal audit teams |
| Secureframe | Full | Full | Partial | Full | $10K–$60K | Mid-market, first-time SOC 2 + PCI |
| Aptible | Infrastructure controls | PCI DSS SP Level 2 (infra) | N/A | N/A | From ~$499/mo | Fintechs needing PCI-attested hosting, pair with GRC tool |
All platforms require auditor fees on top (except Thoropass, which bundles them). Budget $15,000–$50,000 additionally for a Type 2 audit from an independent CPA. See our guide on how long a SOC 2 audit takes for timeline planning.
How to Choose
The decision comes down to four factors: your current framework requirements, whether you need a bundled QSA, your IPO timeline, and your internal team capacity.
If you’re a Series A–C fintech managing SOC 2 + PCI-DSS with an engineering-led team → Drata. The multi-framework depth and automated evidence cross-mapping will save the most time at this stage. The Forrester data backs this up: 78% reduction in audit prep hours is real for teams running two frameworks simultaneously.
If you want the biggest integration library and access to fintech-experienced auditors in-platform → Vanta. Ramp and Modern Treasury are on Vanta for a reason. The auditor marketplace is mature and the integration coverage handles complex stacks.
If you want SOC 2 + PCI-DSS under one vendor including the QSA → Thoropass. No separate assessor to hire. Evidence lives in one place. The bundled model costs more all-in but removes coordination overhead that kills fintech compliance timelines.
If you’re 12–18 months from an IPO or already public and need SOX 404 + SOC 2 in one system → AuditBoard. Nothing else on this list has a purpose-built SOX 404 module that internal audit teams can operate at the rigor a public company requires.
If you’re a mid-market fintech doing your first Type 2 and want a former auditor guiding you → Secureframe. The expert-guidance layer is worth the premium when you do not have an in-house CISO and need someone to tell you what is going to be a problem before the fieldwork starts.
If you’re building payment rails or a PayFac model and want PCI-attested infrastructure from day one → Aptible. The Service Provider Level 2 attestation is the only one of its kind on this list. Pair it with a GRC tool like Drata or Sprinto to cover the administrative half of your program.
For a broader look at every platform in the category, including startup-focused tools and pricing across 12 options, see the full SOC 2 software guide.
FAQ
What is SOC 2 compliance software for fintech?
SOC 2 compliance software for fintech automates evidence collection and continuous control monitoring across SOC 2, PCI-DSS, and — for pre-IPO or public companies — SOX, from a single platform. The fintech-specific requirement is multi-framework depth. A neobank or payment processor cannot run separate tools for each framework and manually reconcile the evidence. The platforms ranked above connect to your cloud infrastructure, identity providers, CI/CD pipelines, and core banking integrations to run automated tests and produce timestamped evidence for CPA auditors and QSAs. See also: SOC 2 for fintech companies.
Do fintechs need SOC 2 or PCI-DSS first?
If you store, process, or transmit cardholder data, PCI-DSS compliance is mandatory — the sequence question is moot. You need both. Most fintechs pursue them in parallel because the control overlap is high: firewall rules, access controls, and vulnerability management evidence satisfies both frameworks with the right platform. Starting with a SOC 2 Type 1 while PCI-DSS scoping is in progress is a common approach. Learn more about what a SOC 2 Type 2 report covers.
Which platforms handle SOC 2 and PCI-DSS together?
Drata, Vanta, Thoropass, Secureframe, and AuditBoard all support both within a single platform. Thoropass is the only one that includes an in-house PCI QSA — you can complete the Report on Compliance without hiring a separate assessor. Drata and Vanta offer the deepest automated control-mapping between the two frameworks. For more context, see SOC 2 software options.
How often do fintechs need a SOC 2 audit?
At minimum, annually. Banking partners typically require a Type 2 report covering the most recent 12-month period. Many require semi-annual refreshes. Some BaaS and sponsor-bank relationships add quarterly evidence pulls on top of the annual cycle. This is why continuous monitoring matters more for fintechs than for companies in other verticals — you need an unbroken evidence trail, not audit-time snapshots.
Can compliance software handle SOX controls for a public fintech?
Yes, with the right tool. AuditBoard is the strongest option for a public or pre-IPO fintech managing SOX Section 404 internal controls alongside SOC 2 — it has a purpose-built SOX module for internal audit teams. Drata and Vanta cover SOX-relevant ITGC controls for pre-IPO readiness but are not substitutes for full SOX 404 management once you are publicly reporting. Understand how long the SOC 2 audit process takes before planning your SOX timeline alongside it.
What is the difference between SOC 2 for fintech and generic SOC 2?
Scope, scrutiny, and frequency. A standard SaaS company does one annual SOC 2 Type 2 and moves on. A fintech faces banking partner audits, state DFI examinations, CFPB oversight, and enterprise RFPs — all requiring current evidence. Fintechs typically include the Processing Integrity TSC to cover transaction accuracy. They need tighter change-management evidence (four-eyes deploys, SOX SDLC controls) and PCI-DSS mapping if they touch card data. The platform you pick needs to handle that complexity, not just automate a basic SOC 2 checklist. Full breakdown in our SOC 2 for fintech guide.