SOC 2 Type 1 auditors for fast point-in-time reports.
Compare 173 attestation-capable firms that issue Type 1 reports. Type 1 is the bridge when a customer needs proof before your Type 2 observation period can finish. Listed fieldwork times are in weeks.
Free and anonymous. 3–10 quotes in 48 hours. One call, not five.
Updated
For a deal blocked on a report, Thoropass bundles the GRC platform with the audit from $15K, Johanson Group LLP publishes a 4–6 week Type 1 planning range and can issue ISO 27001 under IAS MSCB-314, and Zero Day CPA is the economical Type 1 from $5K in 2–6 weeks. We compare 173 Type 1 firms; the fastest listed path is 1 week.
Firms compared
173
Median Type 2 entry
$30K
Fastest timeline
1wk
Verified firms
35%
Best by use case
Best SOC 2 Type 1 auditors by use case
Use case matters more than a generic rank. Start with the row that matches your buying pressure.
Economical · 2–6 wk
Best for economical first Type 1 for health-tech, SaaS, fintech, and AI startups
Zero Day CPA is the economical pick for a first Type 1 from a credentialed boutique CPA. Every audit manager brings 5+ years at a Big Four or major national firm, so health-tech, SaaS, fintech, and AI startups get enterprise-grade rigor at fixed pricing from around $5K, a 2 to 6 week turnaround, and SOC 1/2/3 plus HIPAA coverage.
GRC platform bundle
Best for first Type 1 for under-200-employee buyers with GRC platform bundled
Thoropass is the pick when a first Type 1 needs to ship alongside a GRC platform on a single contract. One vendor handles platform setup, the Type 1 audit, and the Type 2 transition with shared evidence, fixed-fee pricing 25 to 50 percent below traditional firms.
SOC 2 + ISO 27001 CB
Best for Type 1 plus IAS-accredited ISO 27001 from one CPA firm
Johanson Group LLP is an IAS-accredited ISO 27001 certification body (MSCB-314) and a licensed CPA firm, so a Type 1 buyer can keep SOC attestation and ISO certification in one relationship. Its SOC 2 Type 1 page lists a 4–6 week planning range; the Type 2 observation period is separate and typically 6–12 months.
Fixed-fee under $20K
Best for fixed-fee Type 1 for SaaS startups under $20K
MJD Advisors is the pick for a fixed-fee Type 1 from a specialist CPA at the lower end of the credentialed range. 2 to 6 weeks, predictable scope, and a clean Type 2 path when the observation window starts.
Vanta/Drata Series A+
Best for Type 1 for Series A and up on Vanta or Drata
Prescient Security is an option for Series A and growth-stage companies already on Vanta or Drata: Vanta partner, Slack-based audit communication, no on-site visits, and Type 1 inside 3 to 9 weeks.
Multi-framework path
Best for Type 1 as part of a multi-framework path (SOC 2 + ISO 27001 + HIPAA + PCI)
A-LIGN is the pick for a Type 1 that needs to coexist with ISO 27001, HIPAA, or PCI under a single engagement. One of the highest-volume US SOC 2 practices bundles every major framework, so the Type 1 fits a multi-framework roadmap from day one.
Summary of the best-by-use-case recommendations above
Use case
Firm
From price
Timeline
economical first Type 1 for health-tech, SaaS, fintech, and AI startups
Type 1 makes sense when a customer will accept point-in-time assurance while the Type 2 observation period runs. It tests whether controls are suitably designed on a specific date, so it can close a near-term procurement gap. Confirm the buyer accepts that bridge before paying for a separate report.
A Type 1 report is less useful when the buyer explicitly requires operating evidence. In that case, direct the budget and project plan toward Type 2 rather than adding a credential that will not move procurement.
How should Type 1 connect to the Type 2 observation period?
Start Type 2 observation as soon as the Type 1 report is issued, using the same CPA firm, system boundary, and controls. This lets the audit team carry forward its scoping knowledge and keeps the company from repeating discovery work. The bridge should shorten the route to Type 2, not create a second standalone project.
Ask the proposal to show both phases, the handoff date, and the total fee. A fast Type 1 quote can become expensive if the follow-on engagement is vague.
How do you compare SOC 2 audit firms for a fast Type 1?
Compare readiness requirements, report timing, buyer recognition, and the Type 2 follow-on before comparing price. The fastest firm still needs implemented controls to test. A credible proposal states what must exist at kickoff, what evidence the CPA will sample, and when the signed report can reach procurement.
The picks above separate fixed-scope specialists, platform-native firms, and broader practices. Choose the model that fits the deal rather than treating speed as the only ranking signal.
Independent directory. Not owned by any audit firm or compliance platform; we take no cut of audit fees and charge nothing per lead.
Auditor shortlist
SOC 2 Type 1 audit firms
Every listed firm can issue a Type 1 report. Sort by timeline when a deal is gated; confirm readiness expectations before signing, because a fast auditor cannot issue a report for controls that do not exist yet. Pricing is in USD and timelines are in weeks.
Type 1 and Type 2 figures reflect a mix of firm-confirmed numbers, public sources, and our own estimates, refreshed periodically. Actual cost depends on company size, scope, and Trust Service Criteria.
Sort by
Featured firms pay to appear first. Every firm here qualified on editorial fit; payment cannot add a firm or change its facts.
Manufacturers, healthcare practices, and family-owned businesses in Ohio seeking responsive CPAs with deep industry expertise.
Distinctive strength
Team-based approach where clients work with multiple professionals rather than a single account manager; founded 1919 with strong reputation for responsiveness.
Fast-growing SaaS and fintech companies seeking specialist SOC 2 and cybersecurity audit expertise.
Distinctive strength
PCAOB-registered CPA firm founded by Grant Thornton partner, combining audit rigor with specialized SOC 2 and cybersecurity expertise, performing 400+ audits annually.
AICPAPCAOBISO 27001 Lead AuditorPCI DSS QSASaaSFinancial ServicesFinTech
Mid-market SaaS, consulting, and government contractors seeking hands-on SOC 2 guidance with deep industry expertise.
Distinctive strength
CPA firm combining licensed CPAs with cybersecurity professionals, offering industry-specific SOC 2 expertise and practical business value beyond compliance.
Multi-sector technology and SaaS companies requiring structured SOC 2 Type I/II audits with transparent, evidence-based approach
Distinctive strength
Independent CPA-licensed firm, technology-forward audit methodology, transparent evidence-based process, global presence with local expertise across multiple continents
CPAISO 27001 Lead AuditorIC2AICPAtechnologySaaSfintech
Industry-specific expertise across 15+ industries, integrated SOC 2 and ISO 27001 audits, collaborative technology platform, experienced team with CISA and CIA credentials
SaaS, FinTech, HealthTech, e-commerce, regulated industries, enterprises to fast-growing startups
Distinctive strength
CPA-led firm with AICPA standards, end-to-end support from readiness to attestation, global presence with local regulatory expertise, automation-driven compliance execution
Cloud-based software companies with multi-tenant environments
Distinctive strength
Seasoned CPAs and CISAs who perform audits with true assurance diligence, not automated checklists or software-only solutions
CPASaaSCloudTechnology
No firms match that location. SOC 2 audits are remote-first, so any firm here can serve you — clear the filter, or get matched anonymously instead.
Tell us your scope
Tell us your scope once. We match it with firms that regularly price Type 1 audits and send 3–10 ballparks back side by side.
We match firms to your scope and bring their ballpark quotes back. Free and anonymized.
Type 1 fit
Use Type 1 when speed matters more than operating history.
Type 1 validates control design at a point in time. It is useful for sales deadlines, but it is not a replacement for annual Type 2 evidence.
Factor
Type 1
Type 2
Audit question
Are controls designed suitably today?
Did controls operate effectively over time?
Buyer use
Bridge for a near-term deal
Enterprise procurement standard
Timeline
Weeks to a few months
Observation period plus fieldwork
Best next move
Start Type 2 observation immediately after issue
Renew annually with continuous evidence
Selection method
How to choose a Type 1 auditor
A Type 1 engagement is won or lost before fieldwork starts. The right firm gives you a tight scope, a readiness gate, and a clean path into Type 2.
01Confirm the buyer will accept Type 1
Ask procurement whether a Type 1 plus a written Type 2 commitment is enough for the current deal.
02Start the Type 2 observation clock
Use the same CPA firm for Type 1 and Type 2 so evidence and scoping work carry forward.
03Avoid bespoke scope creep
A fixed Security-only scope keeps the Type 1 useful and fast. Add criteria only when the buyer requires them.
FAQ
SOC 2 Type 1 questions
When Type 1 closes the deal, how fast it can move, and how it connects to Type 2.
Should I get SOC 2 Type 1 or Type 2 first?
⌄
It depends on what you are trying to unlock. If you have an enterprise prospect requiring compliance before countersigning, Type 1 is the faster path: published specialist planning ranges commonly run 2 to 8 weeks. The report attests that your controls are suitably designed as of a specific date, which satisfies most mid-market and startup-friendly procurement teams. If you are thinking strategically and do not have a live deal gating on compliance, starting with Type 2 avoids a second engagement fee. The observation period takes 3 to 12 months regardless, and beginning it from day one means your first report carries more weight. The most common pattern for deal-driven startups: start a Type 1 engagement now, have the CPA begin the Type 2 observation the day the Type 1 is issued, and deliver the upgrade in the same cycle without restarting from scratch.
How fast can I get a SOC 2 Type 1 report?
⌄
Published specialist Type 1 planning ranges commonly run 2 to 8 weeks from kickoff to issued report. Johanson Group LLP lists 4–6 weeks on its SOC 2 page; Zero Day CPA lists 2–6 weeks. What can extend the timeline is your readiness. If key controls are not implemented, the auditor has nothing to test for design adequacy. Most firms that offer a short Type 1 also offer a pre-audit readiness check before fieldwork begins, which surfaces the gaps early instead of during testing. Expect the short end of the range if you are running a modern GRC platform and have basic controls in place; expect 6 to 8 weeks if you are starting from scratch on control documentation.
Will an enterprise buyer accept a SOC 2 Type 1?
⌄
Usually yes, with one condition. Most enterprise procurement teams accept a Type 1 when paired with a written commitment to deliver a Type 2 within 12 months. The commitment letter typically comes from your auditor confirming the observation period has started. Government agencies, large health systems, and financial services firms with prescriptive vendor requirements often require Type 2 outright and will not accept Type 1 as a substitute. Before assuming Type 1 is sufficient, ask your champion to check with their procurement or security team. The honest answer you want is that Type 1 is fine for this cycle, or that they need Type 2 within 12 months. Either answer is actionable. What stalls deals is ambiguity, and a 20-minute conversation at the buyer's end usually resolves it.
How do I run Type 1 and Type 2 in parallel?
⌄
Use a single CPA firm for both. When the Type 1 report is issued, the auditor immediately begins the observation period for the Type 2. Evidence gathered during Type 1 fieldwork carries forward because the scope and control set are identical. You are not starting over. The observation window runs while you operate normally, and the auditor returns at the end of that period to test whether controls operated consistently. The total cost of the combined engagement is typically lower than contracting for a Type 1 and then separately engaging for a Type 2 later. Firms that bundle the two into a single fixed-fee engagement make the economics clearest: one contract, one audit team, one evidence collection process, and a Type 2 report at the end of a single 4 to 9 month cycle.
How much does a SOC 2 Type 1 audit cost?
⌄
Specialist firms that treat Type 1 as a standalone product charge $10K to $30K in our research estimates. These are not auditor-confirmed prices; they represent the range we have observed from public pricing and market signals. What drives cost upward: additional Trust Service Criteria beyond Security, a larger or more complex system boundary, and firms that scope each engagement individually rather than offering a fixed-fee product. What keeps cost down: fixing scope to Security only, using a firm with a pre-built Type 1 methodology, and being ready before fieldwork starts. When Type 1 is bundled with the subsequent Type 2 in a single engagement, the incremental cost is often $5K to $15K over the Type 2 fee alone, which makes the combined path the most economical option for companies that know they will eventually need Type 2.
We send your scope to firms that fit your size and stack. They reply with a price and availability. Free, side-by-side, anonymous until you pick. One auditor call, not five.