Compare 173 attestation-capable firms that issue Type 2 reports. Type 2 is the evidence-backed report enterprise buyers ask for because it tests whether controls operated across an observation period.
Free and anonymous. 3–10 quotes in 48 hours. One call, not five.
For Type 2, Thoropass bundles the GRC platform with a first-time audit from $15K, A-LIGN covers enterprise multi-framework scope from $15K, and Johanson Group LLP can add an IAS-accredited ISO 27001 certificate to a CPA-issued SOC 2. We compare 173 Type 2 firms; entry pricing starts near $3K.
Start with the buying constraint: platform bundle, enterprise framework coverage, fastest transition, or Big Four letterhead.
Zero Day CPA is the value pick for a first Type 2 from a credentialed boutique: audit managers with 5+ years at a Big Four or major national firm, so SaaS, fintech, and AI startups get enterprise-grade rigor at fixed pricing from around $7K on a 2 to 6 week turnaround, with SOC 1/2/3 and HIPAA coverage.
Thoropass is the typical pick for a first-time Type 2 that wants the GRC platform and the CPA audit on a single contract. Evidence is shared across SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and PCI under one engagement, with fixed-fee pricing 25 to 50 percent below traditional firms.
A-LIGN is the default pick when enterprise procurement wants SOC 2 Type 2 alongside HITRUST, FedRAMP, or PCI. One of the highest-volume US SOC 2 practices bundles every major framework under one engagement, and procurement teams know the brand on the cover of the report.
Johanson Group LLP can issue the SOC 2 report as a CPA firm and the ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certificate as IAS MSCB-314, so a Type 2 buyer who also needs a certificate does not have to split issuers. Its published Type 2 observation window is typically 6–12 months; the 4–8 week planning range is fieldwork and reporting, not that observation period.
Schellman is the pick for enterprise Type 2 buyers who need FedRAMP or HITRUST optionality without retaining a separate firm. Top 50 CPA, in-house HITRUST and FedRAMP assessors, and reports that satisfy Fortune 500 procurement.
KirkpatrickPrice is the pick for verified Type 2 at the low end of the credentialed-CPA range. A $12K floor, broad framework coverage including SOC 1/2/3, HIPAA, and PCI, and a published methodology that survives enterprise security review.
Deloitte is the default when procurement explicitly requires Big 4 letterhead on the SOC 2 Type 2 report. Used by pre-IPO companies and public-company controls programs where the issuing firm name on the cover is part of the buyer requirement.
| Use case | Firm | From price | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| economical Type 2 for SaaS, fintech, and AI startups | Zero Day CPA | $7k | 2–6 wk |
| first-time Type 2 with GRC platform bundled | Thoropass | $15k | 2–9 wk |
| enterprise multi-framework Type 2 (SOC 2 + HITRUST + PCI + FedRAMP) | A-LIGN | $15k | 3–12 wk |
| Type 2 path that can add an IAS-accredited ISO 27001 certificate | Johanson Group | $15k | 4–8 wk |
| enterprise Type 2 needing FedRAMP or HITRUST optionality | Schellman | $20k | 3–12 wk |
| best-value Type 2 under $20K with broad framework coverage | KirkpatrickPrice | $12k | 3–8 wk |
| public-company or pre-IPO Big 4 letterhead requirement | Deloitte | $60k | 6–18 wk |
Choose the observation period from the buyer's requirement, not from the shortest quote. Three months can unblock an urgent first report, six months is the common middle ground, and twelve months gives regulated or enterprise buyers the strongest operating history. Confirm acceptance before the observation clock starts.
The audit firm should help you work backward from the report date, evidence cadence, and procurement deadline. A fast fieldwork promise cannot compensate for an observation window that the customer rejects.
Use Type 1 as a bridge only when a live deal needs point-in-time assurance before Type 2 can finish. Keep the same CPA firm, scope, and control set, then start the Type 2 observation period immediately. That preserves scoping work and avoids paying a second firm to relearn the environment.
If no buyer is waiting on a report, starting directly with Type 2 is usually cleaner. The observation period can run while the team continues to mature evidence collection.
The strongest Type 2 firm is the one that fits your buyer, framework mix, evidence platform, and renewal calendar. Platform-native specialists can reduce evidence friction, while national firms may carry more procurement recognition. The ranked picks above show the tradeoff instead of treating every listed firm as interchangeable.
Compare like-for-like scopes in writing. The Trust Services Criteria, observation period, in-scope systems, readiness work, and report deadline should match before price becomes meaningful.
Independent directory. Not owned by any audit firm or compliance platform; we take no cut of audit fees and charge nothing per lead.
Every listed firm can issue a Type 2 report. Directory verification is a quality signal in the table, not the membership cut. Sort your shortlist by buyer expectations first, then by cost and observation-window timing.
Type 1 and Type 2 figures reflect a mix of firm-confirmed numbers, public sources, and our own estimates, refreshed periodically. Actual cost depends on company size, scope, and Trust Service Criteria.
Featured firms pay to appear first. Every firm here qualified on editorial fit; payment cannot add a firm or change its facts.
No firms match that location. SOC 2 audits are remote-first, so any firm here can serve you — clear the filter, or get matched anonymously instead.
Tell us your scope once. We match it with firms that regularly price Type 2 audits and send 3–10 ballparks back side by side.
We match firms to your scope and bring their ballpark quotes back. Free and anonymized.
The observation window is the product. A shorter audit quote is not useful if the report does not cover the period your customer expects.
| Factor | 3 months | 6 months | 12 months |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Urgent first report | Most SaaS vendors | Enterprise and regulated buyers |
| Buyer confidence | Minimum evidence | Balanced evidence | Strongest evidence |
| Renewal rhythm | Can feel stale quickly | Common annual cadence | Clean annual cadence |
| Question to ask | Will the buyer accept a 3-month period? | Can the report issue before procurement? | Can we sustain evidence collection? |
The best Type 2 auditor is the one that can run your observation period cleanly and issue the report before the buyer needs it.
Do not default to the shortest period. Ask your largest buyer or security team what they expect.
Make sure the auditor can work with your GRC platform and that evidence owners know their deadlines.
Annual buyers care about stale reports. Time the next period so procurement never sees a gap.
Observation periods, renewal economics, and the Type 1-to-Type 2 bridge.
Send one scope and compare comparable quotes instead of three different assumptions.
Run an audit firm? See how firms get found and shortlisted here — how it works →
Menu