Menu
Auditors
Our picks by fit, each with a passed peer review
Every listed firm, filterable by price and timeline
Consultants
Readiness, pentest, vCISO, and ISO 27001 firms in one list
Software
Every platform we profile, with sourced prices and fit
Our picks by buyer fit, with the tradeoffs
Published prices, add-ons, and audit fees
Learn
Articles on cost, controls, timelines, and auditor choice
Free Tools
A few questions, then your best-fit auditors
Fit-ranked platforms with observed price bands
In Q3 2026, software companies that requested SOC 2 Type 2 quotes through SOC2Auditors.org received a median ballpark of $10,000. Before you choose, ask each firm how it would test tenant isolation and the changes you ship through CI/CD.
Free and anonymous. 3–10 quotes, usually within 48 hours. One call, not five.
There is no universal best SOC 2 audit firm for SaaS. Thoropass Launch is $9,995 for 1-10 employees, Type 1 and Type 2 together, Security only, through October 31, 2026. Zero Day CPA is the Security-only first Type 2 at $7,000 for 1-50 employees.
360 Advanced fits SaaS SOC 2 + multi-framework scope: reuses shared evidence across SOC 2, ISO 27001 and other assessments, reducing repeat requests across your compliance program.
Zero Day CPA fits an early-stage SaaS team buying a Security-only first Type 2. Its firm-confirmed fee is $7,000 for 1-50 employees (confirmed October 2026); Availability is priced on top.
Throughline fits SaaS SOC 2 for products with AI features: a Sydney CPA firm whose SOC 2 testing covers agent access and AI-enabled changes, co-founded by AssuranceLab founder Paul Wenham. A named senior practitioner leads each audit.
Thoropass fits a B2B SaaS team that wants the audit run beside Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, Hyperproof, Archer, or OneTrust. The SOC 2 report is issued by Laika Compliance, LLC dba Thoropass Assurance. Availability and readiness sit outside the Security-only Launch package.
Half the firms on this page list a Type 2 starting estimate of $15,000 to $25,000 (shaded), in line with the median ballpark for companies of 201–500 employees. The software companies that requested quotes came from every company size shown.
For a 50-person B2B SaaS company, compare firms against the system you run and the report your customers require. Ask each finalist how it gathers evidence for tenant isolation, automated deployments, service commitments, and critical vendors, then price the same scope.
Headcount does not pick the firm. Zero Day CPA’s Security-only Type 2 grid stays $7,000 from 1–50 employees, and Availability is priced on top. Thoropass Launch for 11–50 employees is a Type 1 and Type 2 package at $10,995–$11,995, Security only, issued by Laika Compliance, LLC dba Thoropass Assurance. None of these cards is a public case study of tenant-isolation testing. Confirm that sample in the proposal.
Choose a SaaS auditor by testing three things before price: whether the firm understands your tenant-isolation model, whether it will scope Availability against contractual SLAs, and whether its evidence workflow fits your CI/CD and GRC stack. Then compare named engagement staff, observation-period timing, renewal effort, and the exact deliverables in writing.
A B2B SaaS company scaling enterprise sales should work backward from procurement deadlines and likely framework fan-out. Use a fast Type 1 only when the buyer accepts it, start Type 2 evidence in parallel, and shortlist firms that can coordinate SOC 2 with ISO 27001, ISO 42001, HIPAA, or PCI without duplicating evidence.
A bundled provider can simplify contracting, evidence collection, and platform support, while an independent firm can offer more separation and flexibility across GRC tools. Neither model is automatically better. Ask who employs the signing CPA, how independence is protected, what happens if you change platforms, and which work is preparation versus attestation.
The proposal should explain how recurring evidence will be reused, which samples must be refreshed, how control changes are handled, and whether renewal pricing assumes a stable scope. A credible SaaS auditor can describe the year-two workflow before fieldwork begins, including GRC integrations, request ownership, expected engineering time, and the treatment of new subprocessors.
Independent directory. Not owned by any audit firm or compliance platform. We don’t sell your details, and your identity stays private.
Firms on this page list SaaS as an industry. That tag is the inclusion rule. It is not, by itself, evidence the firm has tested tenant isolation or CI/CD, so a card links a dated announcement that names the firm as a software company's examiner, and the register below the cards lists the rest. Prices are directory-listed estimates in USD unless a card names a firm-confirmed package. Timelines are fieldwork-to-report weeks, after readiness and any Type 2 observation period.
Type 1 and Type 2 figures reflect a mix of firm-confirmed numbers, public sources, and our own estimates, refreshed periodically. Actual cost depends on company size, scope, and Trust Services Criteria. See how SOC 2 audit fees compare.
Featured firms pay to appear first. Every firm here cleared our fit bar first; payment cannot add a firm or change its facts.
8 firms keep a full card because the record carries a dated company announcement naming the firm as the SOC 2 examiner of a software company; each card links that record with the date we checked it. The register below lists the other 70 firms, which list SaaS among their industries, with the same fee and fieldwork figures. A sponsored firm keeps its card at its paid position whether or not its record carries that evidence; its card shows its general fit instead.
| Listed for | Request a quote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chiaro Platform required Austin, TX · USA | Listed forB2B SaaS, SaaS | Type 2 fee $2.5K–$6.7K | Fieldwork to report3–4 wk | Peer review Pending first review | |
| Accorp Partners Calabasas, CA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $5K–$8K | Fieldwork to report13–26 wk | Peer review No public rating | |
| Decrypt Compliance San Jose, CA · USA | Listed forB2B SaaS | Type 2 fee $7K–$40K | Fieldwork to report4–8 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| Modern Assurance Denver, CO · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $7K–$42K | Fieldwork to report1–7 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| Prescient Security Nashville, TN · USA | Listed forB2B SaaS | Type 2 fee $10K–$30K | Fieldwork to report2–6 wk | Peer review Pass w/ deficiencies | |
| Sage Audits Westminster, CO · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $10K–$20K | Fieldwork to report5–7 wk | Peer review Not confirmed | |
| KirkpatrickPrice Nashville, TN · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $12K–$45K | Fieldwork to report3–8 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| Barnes Dennig Cincinnati, OH · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $15K–$40K | Fieldwork to report3–9 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| BARR Advisory Kansas City, MO · USA | Listed forB2B SaaS | Type 2 fee $15K–$50K | Fieldwork to report8–16 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| Johanson Group Colorado Springs, CO · USA | Listed forB2B SaaS | Type 2 fee $15K–$30K | Fieldwork to report4–8 wk | Peer review No public rating | |
| MJD Advisors Des Moines, IA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $15K–$35K | Fieldwork to report2–6 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| AARC-360 Atlanta, GA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $15K–$45K | Fieldwork to report4–12 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| MHM Professional Corporation Calgary, AB · Canada | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $15K–$45K | Fieldwork to report2–8 wk | Peer review N/A (non-US) | |
| McKonly & Asbury Camp Hill, PA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $20K–$60K | Fieldwork to report8–16 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| Oread Risk & Advisory Kansas City, KS · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $20K–$50K | Fieldwork to report3–8 wk | Peer review No public rating | |
| Render Compliance Seattle, WA · USA | Listed forB2B SaaS | Type 2 fee $20K–$32K | Fieldwork to report4–8 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| Fine Assurance Pittsburgh, PA · USA | Listed forB2B SaaS, SaaS | Type 2 fee $20K–$80K | Fieldwork to report4–8 wk | Peer review Review not shown | |
| Design Assurance Roswell, GA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $21.9K–$38.3K | Fieldwork to report4–10 wk | Peer review Review not shown | |
| Aprio Atlanta, GA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $22K–$75K | Fieldwork to report4–10 wk | Peer review Pass w/ deficiencies | |
| Frazier & Deeter Atlanta, GA · USA | Listed forTechnology / SaaS | Type 2 fee $25K–$75K | Fieldwork to report4–14 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| Securisea Annapolis, MD · USA | Listed forB2B SaaS | Type 2 fee $25K–$90K | Fieldwork to report4–12 wk | Peer review Review not shown | |
| Frank, Rimerman + Co. Palo Alto, CA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $30K–$80K | Fieldwork to report4–12 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| Coalfire Chicago, IL · USA | Listed forEnterprise SaaS | Type 2 fee $40K–$120K | Fieldwork to report4–12 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| Drummond Group Durham, NC · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $50K–$150K | Fieldwork to report4–16 wk | Peer review Not confirmed | |
| IS Partners Dresher, PA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $50K–$150K | Fieldwork to report8–16 wk | Peer review No public rating | |
| Advantage Partners Seattle, WA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $5K–$50K | Fieldwork to report6–12 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| Consilium Labs El Dorado Hills, CA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $9.6K–$16.3K | Fieldwork to report2–6 wk | Peer review Not enrolled | |
| Tempo Audits Report via CPA partner Bristol · UK | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $13K–$27K | Fieldwork to report2–6 wk | Peer review N/A (non-US) | |
| AssurancePoint Atlanta, GA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $15K–$50K | Fieldwork to report3–8 wk | Peer review Pass w/ deficiencies | |
| Atom Assurances LLC Sheridan, WY · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $15K–$50K 3-mo window | Fieldwork to report2–8 wk | Peer review Review not shown | |
| AuditVisor Fort Lauderdale, FL · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $15K–$45K 6-mo window | Fieldwork to report4–12 wk | Peer review Review not shown | |
| CompliancePoint Assurance Duluth, GA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $15K–$50K | Fieldwork to report6–12 wk | Peer review Not confirmed | |
| Ken & Co Helena, MT · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $15K–$50K | Fieldwork to report4–8 wk | Peer review No public rating | |
| NDNB Accountants Atlanta, GA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $15K–$50K | Fieldwork to report6–12 wk | Peer review Not confirmed | |
| RS Assurance & Advisory Southlake, TX · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $15K–$50K | Fieldwork to report4–8 wk | Peer review Review not shown | |
| Audit Peak New York, NY · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $15K–$45K | Fieldwork to report3–9 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| Auditwerx Tampa, FL · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $15K–$45K | Fieldwork to report3–12 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| Dansa D'Arata Soucia LLP Buffalo, NY · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $15K–$45K | Fieldwork to report3–9 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| Sentry Assurance Cleveland, OH · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $15K–$40K | Fieldwork to report2–8 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| CertPro Germany Berlin · Germany | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $16K–$40K | Fieldwork to report3–8 wk | Peer review Review not shown | |
| CertValue Germany Berlin · Germany | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $16K–$40K | Fieldwork to report3–9 wk | Peer review N/A (non-US) | |
| Linford & Company Denver, CO · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $18K–$58K | Fieldwork to report3–8 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| Insight Assurance Tampa, FL · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $20K–$45K | Fieldwork to report3–6 wk | Peer review No public rating | |
| Risk3sixty Compliance Atlanta, GA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $20K–$60K | Fieldwork to report6–16 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| Tanner LLC Salt Lake City, UT · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $20K–$55K | Fieldwork to report4–8 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| PBMares Newport News, VA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $20K–$55K | Fieldwork to report4–8 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| KNAV CPA LLP Atlanta, GA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $25K–$70K | Fieldwork to report6–16 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| Copeland Buhl Wayzata, MN · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $25K–$60K | Fieldwork to report4–12 wk | Peer review Not confirmed | |
| Larson & Company Salt Lake City, UT · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $25K–$75K | Fieldwork to report4–12 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| Pease Bell CPAs Cleveland, OH · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $25K–$70K | Fieldwork to report4–12 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| Accedere Denver, CO · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $25K–$70K | Fieldwork to report4–10 wk | Peer review Review not shown | |
| Audit Advantage Group Ann Arbor, MI · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $25K–$70K | Fieldwork to report4–10 wk | Peer review Review not shown | |
| CAS Assurance Miramar, FL · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $25K–$70K | Fieldwork to report4–10 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| Lazarus Alliance Scottsdale, AZ · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $25K–$70K | Fieldwork to report4–10 wk | Peer review No public rating | |
| Constellation GRC Seal Beach, CA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $25K–$70K | Fieldwork to report4–10 wk | Peer review Review not shown | |
| CyberCrest Encinitas, CA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $25K–$70K | Fieldwork to report4–10 wk | Peer review Not confirmed | |
| CyberGuard Advantage Las Vegas, NV · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $25K–$70K | Fieldwork to report4–10 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| Baker Tilly Chicago, IL · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $28K–$100K | Fieldwork to report4–12 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| CertPro Newark, DE · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $30K–$80K | Fieldwork to report6–12 wk | Peer review Review not shown | |
| HBK CPAs & Consultants Canfield, OH · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $30K–$80K | Fieldwork to report6–16 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| TrustNet Atlanta, GA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $30K–$80K | Fieldwork to report6–12 wk | Peer review No public rating | |
| Windes Long Beach, CA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $30K–$80K | Fieldwork to report6–12 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| NDB Atlanta, GA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $30K–$80K | Fieldwork to report6–12 wk | Peer review Not confirmed | |
| VISTA InfoSec New York, NY · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $30K–$80K | Fieldwork to report6–12 wk | Peer review Not confirmed | |
| BD Emerson Richmond, VA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $30K–$80K | Fieldwork to report6–12 wk | Peer review No public rating | |
| Wolf & Company Boston, MA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $40K–$100K | Fieldwork to report6–14 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| Smith + Howard Atlanta, GA · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $40K–$100K | Fieldwork to report6–14 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| PYA Knoxville, TN · USA | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $50K–$150K | Fieldwork to report6–14 wk | Peer review Pass | |
| EY India Bengaluru · India | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $75K–$200K | Fieldwork to report6–18 wk | Peer review N/A (non-US) | |
| KPMG India Gurugram · India | Listed forSaaS | Type 2 fee $75K–$200K | Fieldwork to report6–18 wk | Peer review N/A (non-US) |
Package-backed rows show firm-confirmed starting offers with scope; other rows show directory Type 2 ranges with firm-specific pricing provenance. Neither is a live quote. Verify scope and AICPA peer-review status before signing. See how SOC 2 audit fees compare.
No firms match that filter. Clear it to see every firm on this page, or get matched anonymously instead.
Five company announcements name the examining firm. Some identify a platform or controls; others leave the exact report system unstated. Use these historical examples to ask a finalist about the scope and evidence your SaaS engagement needs.
Redwood Software named 360 Advanced, Inc. as the firm that completed its examination.
The announcement does not name a covered product or report period.
Company announcement · Published Jul 25, 2023 · Checked Sep 26, 2026 · Suggest a factual correction
NobleAI named A-LIGN as the firm that conducted its audit.
The release discusses the NobleAI platform without defining the system examined.
Company announcement · Published Jun 18, 2026 · Checked Sep 26, 2026 · Suggest a factual correction
Aderant named Schellman & Company, LLC as the firm that examined these two platforms.
Company announcement · Published Nov 20, 2024 · Checked Sep 26, 2026 · Suggest a factual correction
RentSpree named Sensiba LLP as the firm that issued its audit report.
The announcement describes RentSpree rental management software without defining the system examined.
Company announcement · Published Jan 9, 2024 · Checked Sep 26, 2026 · Suggest a factual correction
CData Software named LBMC as the firm that performed its audit.
The announcement refers to CData Software systems without naming the exact system examined.
Company announcement · Published Oct 17, 2023 · Checked Sep 26, 2026 · Suggest a factual correction
These are historical company statements, not a current client or subscriber list, an endorsement, or a review of the underlying SOC 2 reports.
Tell us your scope once. We match it with firms that regularly audit SaaS companies and send 3–10 ballparks back side by side.
We match firms to your scope and bring their ballpark quotes back. Free and anonymized.
SOC 2 lets you choose which Trust Service Criteria to include, and nearly every report has Security. Most B2B SaaS starts with Security and Availability; the right additions depend on product behavior and customer contracts.
| Factor | What it covers | SaaS relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Security (CC) | Logical access, encryption, monitoring, incident response | Included in nearly every report |
| Availability | Uptime, performance monitoring, disaster recovery | Ask when contracts commit you to uptime or recovery |
| Confidentiality | Data classification, NDA enforcement, data destruction | Add for sensitive business data |
| Processing Integrity | Accurate, complete, authorised data processing | Add for FinTech, payments, data pipelines |
| Privacy | PII collection, consent, data subject rights | Add for end-user PII at scale or EU customers |
Five questions that decide whether the proposal matches the system you run. An industry tag does not answer them.
Ask the firm to name the isolation control it will test and how that control will be described for a customer security review. Separate databases, row-level security, and other designs are all in play. None of them is an automatic finding or an automatic pass.
If a contract commits you to uptime or recovery, ask whether Availability is in the first examination. That follows the commitments and the criteria you select. It is not required by every SaaS agreement.
Ask how the firm will sample pull-request approvals, deployment gates, and rollback. A credible answer does not require a ticket for every release, and it does not ignore production changes either.
Ask which vendors the firm will sample, which of their reports it will read, and which reviews stay on your side. The directory does not award a vendor-tiering template to a firm because it lists SaaS.
Ask which evidence can be reused, which samples must be refreshed, and what the year-two fee assumes if the scope stays stable. This page does not publish a renewal-effort percentage or a year-two fee band.
The 78 firms on this page that list SaaS have a median listed Type 2 starting estimate of $20,000. It is a directory estimate for the first-year audit alone, not a fee paid.
$10,000
$20,000
$75,000
Readiness, software, testing
Five questions specific to SaaS architecture, TSC selection, and ongoing compliance, separate from the general first-audit questions on the startups page.
SOC 2 attestation vs consulting · SOC 2 reports must be issued by licensed Certified Public Accountants under AICPA standards (SSAE 18). Many GRC vendors offer SOC 2 preparation but cannot issue the attestation report itself.
Verify credentials · Confirm AICPA peer-review status and SSAE 18 attestation authority before signing. SaaS-specialised firms typically publish their AICPA peer-review report on request.
Disclaimer · Pricing and timelines shown reflect a mix of firm-confirmed figures, public sources, and our own estimates, refreshed periodically. Actual costs and timelines vary based on company size, complexity, and scope.
Tell us your stack, customer profile, and TSC scope. We send it to SaaS-fluent firms that fit. They reply with a ballpark, a timeline, and what makes them different.
Run an audit firm? See how firms get found and shortlisted here: how it works →