Logo Menu

Auditors

By company
By country
By audit type
By platform

Consultants

SOC 2 support

Software

By category

By company

Popular reviews

Learn

  • SOC 2 Insights

    Articles on cost, controls, timelines, and auditor choice

Start here

Reference

Free Tools

Plan and budget

SOC 2 audit tracking platforms: 7 compared

For SOC 2 audit tracking, Thoropass fits teams that want evidence requests, findings, and the CPA examination handled together. Choose Vanta for auditor requests alongside connector-collected evidence, Secureframe for expert guidance. The CPA examination is priced separately.

Compare the platforms ↓

By Peter Korpak / Updated

Buyer workspaces
7
Evidence fields
4graded
Adjacent systems
2separate jobs
Buyer workspaces

How do I compare SOC 2 audit tracking platforms?

Compare the 7 buyer workspaces by audit handoff, evidence automation, testing cadence, framework model, and price scope. The list is unranked. A Yes grade means the cited source establishes that capability; it does not mean every workflow or contract tier.

Evidence through Oct 27, 2026

Thoropass

Best fit

Teams that want the auditor to run the engagement on Thoropass's audit platform, with or without another GRC tool

Limitation

Common ownership may conflict with buyer policy; outside-CPA access and exit rights need written confirmation

Testing cadence

continuous, interval not published vendor claimed · checked Jul 24, 2026

Price and package scope

Quote-based (reported from $15K/yr)

Observed year estimate, checked 2026-10-20; it is not a vendor rate card.

Compliance Platform: $8.7K per year; Compliance Platform dimension, including the first framework. 1 other public prices use their own package or usage scope.

Price basis source · Oct 20, 2026 Package scope source · Oct 20, 2026
Evidence through Oct 20, 2026

Vanta

Best fit

Cloud-native SaaS teams on mainstream stacks that value a broad integration catalog

Limitation

Direct pricing is quote-only, and SCIM may require an add-on

Testing cadence

hourly vendor claimed · checked Sep 30, 2026

Price and package scope

Quote-based (reported $7.5K–$57K/yr)

Observed year estimate, checked 2026-10-15; it is not a vendor rate card.

Essentials: $14K per 12-month contract; 1-20 employees through AWS Marketplace. 9 other public prices use their own package or usage scope. Enterprise require a quote.

Price basis source · Oct 15, 2026 Package scope source · Oct 20, 2026
Evidence through Oct 20, 2026

Drata

Best fit

Growth-stage SaaS teams on mainstream stacks that expect to add frameworks over time

Limitation

Renewal-price growth is a recurring complaint, and native SCIM provisioning is not publicly documented

Testing cadence

daily, every evening at 19:00 PST vendor claimed · checked Sep 30, 2026

Price and package scope

Quote-based (reported $9.4K–$68K/yr)

Observed year estimate, checked 2026-09-30; it is not a vendor rate card.

AWS Marketplace Foundation Package: $15K per 12-month contract; List price for a company with 1 to 50 FTE; excludes the independent CPA examination and any buyer-specific private offer. 16 other public prices use their own package or usage scope. Foundation, Advanced, Enterprise, Assurance Foundation, Assurance Advanced require a quote.

Price basis source · Sep 30, 2026 Package scope source · Oct 20, 2026
Evidence through Oct 20, 2026

Secureframe

Best fit

Teams that want expert guidance on named Fundamentals, Complete, or Defense packages

Limitation

SSO and SCIM require quote-based Complete; Fundamentals starts at a published $7,500/year before scope and services

Price and package scope

Fundamentals from $7.5K/yr

Observed year estimate, checked 2026-09-30; it is not a vendor rate card.

Fundamentals: $7.5K per year; Fundamentals starting price; buyer-specific scope, implementation, add-ons, and audit fee require a quote. Complete, Defense require a quote.

Price basis source · Sep 30, 2026 Package scope source · Oct 20, 2026
Evidence through Oct 12, 2026

Sprinto

Best fit

Early- to growth-stage SaaS teams seeking guided first-audit preparation

Limitation

Limited enterprise access controls and no native data-loss-prevention or DSPM tooling

Testing cadence

continuous, interval not published vendor claimed · checked Sep 30, 2026

Price and package scope

Quote-based

No observed price is established.

Sprinto Starter Platform: $7.5K per 12-month contract; Starter Platform only, up to 100 employees, through AWS Marketplace. 1 other public prices use their own package or usage scope. Foundation, Growth require a quote.

Package scope source · Sep 30, 2026
Evidence through Oct 27, 2026

Hyperproof

Best fit

Established GRC teams running several frameworks and audits at once

Limitation

Too broad and costly for many small teams pursuing a single first SOC 2 report

Testing cadence

unknown unknown · checked Jul 24, 2026

Price and package scope

Quote-based (reported $22K–$70K/yr)

Observed year estimate, checked 2026-09-29; it is not a vendor rate card.

Package inclusions are not itemized in this comparison; request a scoped quote and confirm what the price includes.

Price basis source · Sep 29, 2026
Evidence through Oct 5, 2026

Strike Graph

Best fit

Teams reusing evidence across frameworks with visible higher-plan starting prices

Limitation

Certify price is unlisted; Evidence API is listed on Enterprise; add-ons cost extra

Testing cadence

customer-defined evidence refresh; validation on upload or update vendor claimed · checked Oct 4, 2026

Price and package scope

Free tier

year price evidence checked 2026-10-05.

Scale: $22K per year; Scale plan starting price. 4 other public prices use their own package or usage scope. Free signup, Certify require a quote.

Price basis source · Oct 5, 2026 Package scope source · Oct 5, 2026
Graded evidence fields. Open a cell source to read what the grade establishes and when it was checked.
Platform Audit workspaceEvidence automationContinuous testingNative framework model
Thoropass Yes Checked Sep 30, 2026 Yes Checked Jul 24, 2026 Yes Checked Jul 24, 2026 Yes Checked Jul 24, 2026
Vanta Yes Checked Sep 30, 2026 Yes Checked Sep 30, 2026 Yes Checked Sep 30, 2026 Partial Checked Jul 24, 2026
Drata Yes Checked Sep 30, 2026 Yes Checked Jul 24, 2026 Yes Checked Jul 24, 2026 Partial Checked Jul 24, 2026
Secureframe Yes Checked Oct 5, 2026 Yes Checked Oct 2, 2026 Yes Checked Jul 24, 2026 Yes Checked Jul 24, 2026
Sprinto Yes Checked Sep 30, 2026 Yes Checked Jul 24, 2026 Yes Checked Jul 24, 2026 Partial Checked Aug 11, 2026
Hyperproof Yes Checked Sep 30, 2026 Yes Checked Jul 24, 2026 unknown Checked Jul 24, 2026 Partial Checked Jul 24, 2026
Strike Graph Yes Checked Oct 4, 2026 Yes Checked Oct 4, 2026 Yes Checked Oct 4, 2026 Partial Checked Oct 4, 2026

“Native framework model” is a narrow evidence grade: partial commonly means the source describes shared controls or cross-mapping. It does not mean partial SOC 2 support. “Continuous testing” and a published cadence are separate because some vendors use “continuous” without stating an interval.

Different jobs

Why are Optro and A-SCEND listed separately?

Optro is an internal-audit system. A-SCEND is an auditor-owned workflow included with applicable A-LIGN engagements. Neither belongs in the 7 buyer workspaces above.

Internal-audit system

Optro

Enterprise GRC and compliance-automation platform for audit, controls, IT risk and multi-framework compliance, including SOC 2.

Audit workspace: Yes · continuous testing: Yes · price: Quote-based.

Sources checked through Oct 12, 2026 · full comparison record
Auditor-owned workflow

A-SCEND

Audit management and evidence-workflow platform, bundled with an A-LIGN audit engagement rather than licensed separately.

Audit workspace: Yes · continuous testing: No · price: Quote-based.

Sources checked through Aug 24, 2026 · limited record
Selection method

How to shortlist an audit workspace

Start with the handoff between your team and the signing CPA, then compare automation and price within that workflow.

01Choose who owns the workspace

A buyer workspace should remain useful before and after the audit. If the workspace comes with the audit engagement, confirm what you can export and what happens when you change firms.

02Test the real evidence handoff

Ask the selected auditor to demonstrate how requests, permissions, comments, exceptions, and exports work with your proposed tier. A generic auditor portal claim does not establish every workflow detail.

03Normalize the commercial scope

Separate software, implementation, add-ons, readiness help, and the CPA examination. Compare annual terms with annual terms and keep marketplace dimensions tied to their employee or usage band.

FAQ

Audit tracking platform questions

How the grades and prices were sourced.

Which SOC 2 platforms document evidence requests and audit tracking?

⌄
For SOC 2 audit tracking, Thoropass fits teams that want evidence requests, findings, and the CPA examination handled together. Choose Vanta for auditor requests alongside connector-collected evidence, Secureframe for expert guidance. The CPA examination is priced separately.

What is the difference between SOC 2 audit tracking and compliance automation?

⌄
Audit tracking coordinates requests, evidence review, questions, and status during an examination. Compliance automation collects and maps evidence before and between audits. The products compared here can cover both jobs to different degrees, which is why the table grades the audit workspace and evidence automation separately.

Which SOC 2 audit tracking platforms are compared here?

⌄
Thoropass, Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto, Hyperproof, Strike Graph are the 7 buyer workspaces in the primary comparison. The table grades audit handoffs for those workspaces.

Does audit tracking software perform or sign the SOC 2 audit?

⌄
Usually no. Most buyer workspaces prepare and exchange evidence while a separately engaged licensed CPA firm performs the examination and signs the report. Thoropass offers a connected path through its affiliated CPA practice. Confirm the legal report issuer and itemized software and audit fees in the proposal.

Are Optro and A-SCEND alternatives to these buyer workspaces?

⌄
Optro is an internal-audit and enterprise GRC system. A-SCEND is the audit workflow included with applicable A-LIGN engagements and is not sold as standalone SOC 2 compliance software. Neither is counted in the 7-platform buyer comparison.

How should I compare SOC 2 software prices?

⌄
Compare the same billing period and scope. A vendor-published starting plan, a marketplace package for a specific employee band, and a third-party observed contract range answer different questions. The table labels each basis and keeps an unknown price as unknown rather than treating it as free.

Do I need audit tracking software to complete SOC 2?

⌄
No. A small or experienced team can coordinate evidence with ordinary project tools if its auditor accepts that workflow. Software becomes useful when recurring evidence, several system owners, multiple frameworks, or repeated audits make freshness and handoffs hard to manage. Test the export and auditor-access workflow before buying.
Next comparison

Related tools and directories

Directory

SOC 2 software comparison

Compare the broader software directory and its evidence grades.
Buyer fit

Best SOC 2 compliance software

Match the product category to your team and audit path.
Cost

SOC 2 software pricing

Read the scope behind public and observed price evidence.
One call, not five

Need an auditor that can work with your platform?

Tell us your current GRC stack and target report date. We route the scope to firms that can work with it.

58-second form · Anonymous until you pick.