A SOC 2 audit tracking platform is the project-management layer on top of compliance automation — evidence requests, owner assignments, finding remediation, and the progress view your auditor uses to sign the report. The 10 tools below split into two camps: built for the buyer (your team) or built for the auditor (the firm running the engagement). Picking the wrong camp is the most expensive mistake here.
Below: how the buyer-side and auditor-side tools differ, a capability matrix across all 10, six common scenarios with concrete picks, and what each is actually for. No paid placement.
The same audit gets tracked twice: once by your team (what evidence have we shipped?), once by the auditor (what working papers have we tested?). Buyer-side tools own your view; auditor-side tools own theirs. They overlap in the middle — at the evidence handoff — which is where the cheap mistakes happen.
Buyer-side (your team)
What controls are passing. What evidence is stale. Who owns the open requests. The auditor portal is read-only — your auditor sees what you see, scoped down. You buy this.
Examples: Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto, Hyperproof, Thoropass, Strike Graph.
Auditor-side (the firm)
What controls have been tested. What samples were pulled. What exceptions were logged. You don't see this directly — you see the request queue. The auditor buys this (or the firm built it themselves).
Examples: Audora, AuditBoard, A-LIGN A-SCEND.
Match your scenario, not your feature wishlist. Most teams pick the wrong tool by comparing checkboxes that never come up in the actual audit.
If this is you
Your auditor said: "We use Vanta — set us up."
Start here
Auditor-portal access is in-platform. They get scoped read-only to your workspace. Anything else creates friction.
If this is you
You'll run SOC 2 + ISO 27001 + HIPAA on the same evidence.
Start here
Both map controls across 25+ frameworks. Track one audit, ship three. Drata if you want API-led drift alerts; Hyperproof if you have a GRC team running multiple programs at once.
If this is you
It's your first audit and nobody on the team has done one.
Start here
You get a named compliance manager — usually a former auditor — who triages the evidence-request queue with you. Cuts the "what does this control actually mean" loop.
If this is you
Seed-stage. Cheapest workable option.
Start here
Free tier to start, paid from $9K/yr with public pricing. Tracking is lighter — you'll do more manual chasing — but the dashboard tells you where the gaps are.
If this is you
You want one vendor for software and the audit.
Start here
Both bundle the platform with their own CPA firm. One contract, one workspace. The trade: you can't shop the audit separately if you change your mind on pricing.
If this is you
Your auditor uses their own system and your team uses Vanta.
Start here
Vanta + Audora (audit firm pays for Audora)
Audora Connect pulls evidence out of Vanta into the auditor's workspace. You stay in Vanta; they stay in Audora; the integration handles the handoff.
Seven capabilities that matter during a live audit. Marketing pages will tell you everyone has all seven. They don't.
| Platform | Segment | Live progress dashboard | Evidence-request workflow | Auditor portal | Finding remediation | Audit trail / version log | Drift alerts | Cross-framework view |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanta | Buyer-side | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
| Drata | Buyer-side | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
| Secureframe | Buyer-side | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
| Sprinto | Buyer-side | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
| Hyperproof | Buyer-side | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ○ | ● |
| Thoropass | Buyer-side | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ○ | ● |
| Strike Graph | Buyer-side | ● | ● | ● | ○ | ● | ○ | ○ |
| Audora | Auditor-side | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ○ | ● |
| AuditBoard | Auditor-side | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ○ | ● |
| A-LIGN A-SCEND | Auditor-side | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ○ | ● |
● = native to the platform · ○ = absent or weak. "Drift alerts" means real-time API-driven alerts when a control falls out of compliance — not weekly digest emails.
You own the contract. Your auditor gets a read-only login. These are the platforms compliance teams compare when budgeting their first audit.
Best for: Teams whose auditor uses Vanta
1,200+ automated tests run continuously. The auditor portal is in-platform — your auditor sees the same workspace you see, scoped to read-only. Most third-party SOC 2 auditors already have a Vanta login on file.
Tier by company size + framework count.
Read full review →Best for: Multi-framework programs (SOC 2 + ISO + HIPAA)
Spins up a separate audit workspace for the auditor with mapped evidence, control status, and a change log. Strong if you plan to run SOC 2, ISO 27001, and HIPAA on shared evidence. Auditor fees billed outside the platform.
Per-framework + per-employee.
Read full review →Best for: First-time SOC 2 with a hand-held workflow
Each account gets a dedicated compliance expert — often a former auditor — who runs the evidence-request triage with you. The workflow is more guided than Vanta or Drata; better fit if no one on your team has run an audit before.
Includes a named compliance manager.
Read full review →Best for: Fast first audit with a prescriptive plan
Tracks the audit as a fixed plan — not a flexible workspace. Good when you want to be told what to do next; less good when your auditor wants to deviate from the prescribed path.
Startup pricing on request.
Read full review →Best for: GRC teams with multiple concurrent audits
Built around task assignment and progress dashboards across 140+ frameworks. Strong if you have a real GRC function tracking 3+ audits at once. Continuous monitoring is more documentation-led than API-led — fewer real-time drift alerts than Vanta or Drata.
Mid-market and up.
Best for: One vendor for the platform and the audit
Includes its own in-house CPA practice. The audit and the tracking happen in one system — fewer handoffs, but you can't take the workspace to a different auditor next year without exporting and re-mapping.
Bundled with audit fee.
Best for: Seed-stage startups on a hard budget
The only platform here that publishes pricing. Tracking is functional but lighter — the dashboard tells you what's missing; you do the chasing yourself. Add-ons can push the bill higher than the headline tier.
One of one with public pricing.
You won't pick these — your auditor does. Listed because they shape what the engagement feels like from your side, and because the buyer-side tool you pick has to play nicely with whatever your auditor uses.
Best for: When your auditor wants their own system
Auditor-first workflow. Pulls evidence from your Vanta or Drata via Audora Connect, then runs the testing, sampling, and report-drafting on the auditor side. You see the request queue and respond — you don't see the auditor's working papers. Used by mid-size SOC 2 audit firms.
Buyer doesn't see the bill.
Best for: Internal audit teams at mid-market and up
Used inside the company by an internal audit function — not by the SOC 2 auditor. Board-level analytics across audits. Overkill below 500 employees; the right fit if you have a CAE and a published internal audit plan.
Enterprise-tier only.
Best for: Teams using A-LIGN as their SOC 2 auditor
A-LIGN clients only. AI-assisted audit management tied to A-LIGN's CPA practice. Tracks the audit on rails that A-LIGN built for itself — efficient if you're already a client, irrelevant otherwise.
Bundled into the audit fee.
Tracking is one decision in a longer chain. The pages below cover the rest.
Compliance automation collects evidence continuously across your stack so you have something to show; audit tracking is the project-management layer on top — evidence requests, owner assignments, finding remediation, and progress through to sign-off. Most platforms in this list do both. A few (Audora, AuditBoard) only do tracking.
You can — for a Type 1 with under 50 controls. Above that, the issue isn't the spreadsheet, it's freshness: an auditor will reject screenshots dated three months ago, and a spreadsheet doesn't catch staleness. The tracking platform is what flags expired evidence before the auditor does.
Yes, but a different one. The auditor side (Audora, A-LIGN A-SCEND) handles their working papers; the buyer side (Vanta, Drata, Secureframe) handles your evidence and your team's task list. Audora Connect bridges the two so you don't double-collect evidence.
They shorten the prep and the back-and-forth — typically 6–8 weeks of evidence chasing collapses to 1–2 weeks. They cannot shorten the Type 2 observation window. Three months of operating evidence is still three months whether you track it in Vanta or in Notion.
Most specialist firms (A-LIGN, Prescient, Sensiba, Schellman, Insight Assurance) accept Vanta, Drata, and Secureframe natively — they have logins on file. Hyperproof and Thoropass are accepted but slower because the auditor is less likely to be fluent in the workspace. Ask your shortlist before signing.
Public price: Strike Graph from $9,000/yr. Quote-based: Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto, and Hyperproof typically $7,500–$50,000/yr depending on company size and framework count. Auditor-side tools (Audora, A-LIGN A-SCEND) are paid by the auditor and bundled into the audit fee. See the full breakdown on our SOC 2 audit cost page.
Technically yes; in practice no. Evidence formats differ between platforms, and your auditor has already loaded artifacts into one system. Switch after your current report is issued, before the next observation window starts.
Most teams pick the tracking platform after they've picked the auditor — because the auditor's preferred tool narrows the field. Get three real quotes from verified firms before you commit to a platform.
Get 3 anonymous quotes
Menu