Most government contractors need FedRAMP, CMMC, or NIST 800-171 before SOC 2. Commercial and federal hybrid companies still need SOC 2 when enterprise buyers ask for it, so this page routes you to firms that understand both sides of the work.
Free and anonymous. 3–10 quotes in 48 hours. One call, not five.
Tell us your scope once. We match it with firms that understand government contractor requirements and send 3–10 ballparks back side by side.
We match firms to your scope and bring their ballpark quotes back. Free and anonymized.
For government contractors, 360 Advanced covers FedRAMP 3PAO and SOC 2 overlap from $15K, Schellman fits defense supply-chain and commercial assurance from $20K, and A-LIGN runs FedRAMP, CMMC, and SOC 2 under one engagement from $15K. We compare 72 firms with government or defense signals, including 11 on the 3PAO overlap page and 19 on the C3PAO overlap page; listed timelines start at 1 week.
360 Advanced is the pick when a govtech cloud provider needs FedRAMP 3PAO authority and a CPA-issued SOC 2 report on coordinated evidence. Multi-framework scope across FedRAMP, ISO 27001, HITRUST, and SOC 2 under one engagement team.
Thoropass is the pick for a govtech SaaS team that wants the GRC platform and CPA audit bundled while commercial buyers ask for SOC 2. Fixed-fee pricing, auditor-led Type 2 work, and multi-framework coverage when federal overlap is still maturing.
Schellman is the pick for defense suppliers and govcon SaaS vendors that need CMMC C3PAO work beside a commercial SOC 2 report. FedRAMP 3PAO, CMMC C3PAO, Top 50 CPA, and a brand enterprise security teams already recognize.
A-LIGN is the pick for mid-market government contractors that need FedRAMP, CMMC, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 coordinated on one calendar. One of the highest-volume US SOC 2 practices runs the federal and commercial framework stack together.
Government contractors need SOC 2 when commercial buyers, prime contractors, or procurement teams ask for a Type 2 report. Federal contracts more often require FedRAMP, CMMC, FISMA, or NIST 800-171, so SOC 2 should be scoped around the buyer who requested it.
The mistake is treating SOC 2 as a substitute for federal authorization. It is not. SOC 2 is a CPA attestation report used heavily in commercial vendor risk review. FedRAMP and CMMC are different credential paths with different authorities. A govtech company that sells to both federal agencies and commercial enterprises can still need SOC 2, but the SOC 2 report should fit beside the federal path instead of pretending to replace it.
A small set of firms are both FedRAMP 3PAOs and SOC 2 audit providers. Those firms are useful when a cloud service provider is pursuing federal authorization while commercial customers also ask for SOC 2 evidence. Verify the 3PAO status and CPA attestation path separately.
FedRAMP work is heavier than SOC 2. It uses NIST 800-53, agency review, and authorization workflows that do not map one-to-one to a SOC 2 report. The overlap is still valuable: access control, change management, vulnerability management, logging, incident response, and vendor risk evidence can often be reused when the work is planned by one team.
Defense contractors should look for CMMC C3PAO authority when certification is required and CPA authority when SOC 2 is required. One firm may support both, but the buyer should confirm which entity signs each output and which evidence can be reused.
CMMC matters when controlled unclassified information, DoD contracts, or defense supply-chain obligations are in scope. SOC 2 matters when commercial customers want an attestation report they already know how to review. The best federal-overlap firms can explain the boundary in plain terms before you start fieldwork.
Govtech SaaS should plan the strictest contract requirement first, then layer SOC 2 where commercial buyers need it. Starting with a shared evidence map reduces duplicate interviews and screenshots, but the report, authorization, and certification timelines remain separate.
A Type 2 SOC 2 report usually follows a defined observation window. FedRAMP and CMMC have their own review gates. If you need both, ask each firm for a calendar that shows when evidence is collected, which controls overlap, what cannot be reused, and which output arrives first.
Independent directory. Not owned by any audit firm or compliance platform. We don’t sell your details, and your identity stays private.
This is a broad govcon shortlist. For formal federal credentials, use the FedRAMP 3PAO and CMMC C3PAO overlap pages linked below.
Type 1 and Type 2 figures reflect a mix of firm-confirmed numbers, public sources, and our own estimates, refreshed periodically. Actual cost depends on company size, scope, and Trust Service Criteria.
Featured firms pay to appear first. Every firm here cleared our fit bar first; payment cannot add a firm or change its facts.
No firms match that filter. Clear it to see every firm on this page, or get matched anonymously instead.
Tell us your scope once. We match it with firms that understand government contractor requirements and send 3–10 ballparks back side by side.
We match firms to your scope and bring their ballpark quotes back. Free and anonymized.
Government contracting queries often mix three different needs: commercial SOC 2, federal cloud authorization, and defense-supply-chain certification.
| Factor | Use SOC 2 | Use FedRAMP or CMMC |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer | Commercial enterprise or prime contractor | Federal agency or DoD supply chain |
| Output | CPA attestation report | ATO path or CMMC certification |
| Best evidence reuse | Access, change, vendor, monitoring controls | NIST 800-53 or 800-171 mapped evidence |
| Firm credential to verify | CPA and peer review | 3PAO or C3PAO authorization |
Use SOC 2 for commercial assurance. Use the federal framework your contract names for authorization or certification. When both are in play, shortlist firms that can coordinate the evidence calendar.
If the agreement names FedRAMP, CMMC, DFARS, or NIST 800-171, SOC 2 alone will not satisfy it.
Cloud products sold to federal agencies often point toward FedRAMP or agency authorization. Defense supply-chain products usually point toward CMMC.
SOC 2 still matters when banks, SaaS buyers, healthcare companies, or enterprise procurement teams ask for a Type 2 report.
The practical distinction is credential authority: who can issue the report, authorization, or certification the buyer actually asked for.
Send the contract language, buyer type, cloud boundary, and deadline. We route it to firms that can tell you which evidence path fits.
Run an audit firm? See how firms get found and shortlisted here — how it works →
Menu