Menu
Quick Answer: Thoropass is the strongest fit for growth-stage and regulated companies that want a single vendor for both compliance automation and the SOC 2 audit itself. Its in-house AICPA-peer-reviewed CPA firm (Laika Compliance, LLC dba Thoropass Assurance), First Pass AI, and HITRUST MyCSF integration set it apart from every other platform in this series. It is not the right call for bootstrapped budgets, enterprises with strict third-party-auditor policies, or teams that need 400+ integrations.
Rating: 4.5/5 (informed by G2 4.7/~575 reviews and our editorial panel). Best alternatives: Vanta, Drata, Secureframe, Sprinto.
Thoropass serves 1,000+ customer organizations globally. Real-world deal values average $30,728/yr (Vendr). First Pass AI cut the average audit cycle from 73 to 29 days across the first 300+ audits it ran. Those numbers frame the platform’s core premise: software and audit collapsed into a single, AI-accelerated engagement under one roof.
Is Thoropass the Right Tool for Your SOC 2?
Thoropass is a compliance automation platform founded in 2019 (rebranded from Laika in October 2023). Its core job — automated controls tests, evidence collection, real-time compliance dashboard — is similar to Vanta or Drata. The differentiator: Laika Compliance, LLC dba Thoropass Assurance, an AICPA-registered, peer-reviewed CPA firm under common ownership, issues your SOC report. If you need the freedom to choose your own auditor, evaluate Vanta or Drata instead.
Thoropass at a Glance
| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2019 (as Laika; rebranded Thoropass October 2023) |
| HQ | New York, NY |
| Customers | 1,000+ organizations globally |
| Funding | ~$98M total (last: $35M Series B, Centana Growth Partners) |
| Frameworks | 30+ (SOC 1, SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, HIPAA, HITRUST CSF e1/i1/r2, PCI DSS 4.0, GDPR, NIST CSF 2.0) |
| Integrations | 100+ (AWS, GCP, Azure, Okta, GitHub, Jira, Rippling, Datadog, CrowdStrike) |
| G2 Rating | 4.7 / ~575 reviews (2026-Q2) |
| Base Pricing (AWS Marketplace) | $8,700/yr platform + $5,800/yr SOC 2 audit subscription |
| Bundled Pricing | $35K–$80K/yr (SMB, platform + Type 2 audit) |
| Best For | Growth-stage companies; HITRUST + SOC 2 programs; teams wanting one vendor for software plus audit |
Thoropass Suitability Scorecard
| Company Profile | Suitability (1–5) | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Early-Stage Startup (Seed–Series A) | 4/5 | Bundled audit removes vendor-coordination overhead; First Pass AI accelerates first audit. Slightly over-engineered for minimal seed-stage programs. |
| Growth-Stage Company (Series B–C) | 5/5 | Ideal fit: multi-framework concurrency, advisory-as-a-service, favorable TCO vs unbundled. |
| Mid-Market / Enterprise | 3/5 | Strong for HITRUST + SOC 2; loses ground where procurement requires a fully independent auditor or 400+ integrations. |
| Heavily Regulated (FinTech, HealthTech, payment processing) | 5/5 | HITRUST MyCSF sync, PCI QSAC, and HITRUST Accredited Assessor status. Most credentialed single-vendor option for regulated industries. |
| Bootstrapped / Low Budget | 2/5 | Real-world deal medians ($30K+) and advisory-tier costs exceed most bootstrapped budgets. |
Thoropass Pros and Cons
✅ Thoropass Pros
- Connected audit model — Laika Compliance, LLC dba Thoropass Assurance is an AICPA peer-reviewed CPA firm under the same roof. Meet your auditor day 1, no third-party handoff.
- G2 Quality of Support 9.6/10 — highest support sub-score in the compliance automation category, ahead of Vanta (9.0) and Drata.
- First Pass AI — cut average audit cycle from 73 to 29 days (60%). ISO 42001 certified for AI governance; customer data never used outside the engagement.
- HITRUST MyCSF two-way sync — eliminates duplicate uploads between Thoropass and HITRUST’s portal. The most differentiated integration for healthcare and regulated-data buyers.
- Transparent AWS Marketplace pricing — $8,700/yr platform + $5,800/yr SOC 2 audit subscription, the only publicly listed GRC platform prices in this review series.
❌ Thoropass Cons
- ~100 integrations vs Vanta 400+ / Drata 300+ — the largest functional gap. Teams with broad or custom toolchains will hit missing integrations more often.
- Cannot bring your own auditor — by design. If your procurement requires a fully independent CPA firm with no common ownership, Thoropass does not fit without a policy exception.
- UI feels cluttered and slower at scale — consistent feedback across G2 and AWS Marketplace reviews. Evaluate in a live demo before signing.
- Procurement-default friction at enterprises — some CISOs and procurement teams reject same-ownership arrangements as standing policy even when the Laika Compliance LLC structure satisfies AICPA rules. Resolve this before purchase, not after.
- Smaller capital base, no Series C disclosed — 189 employees, -4.1% YoY headcount, no public funding beyond the 2023 Series B. Factor into 3–5 year vendor-risk assessments.
Is Thoropass Actually an Auditor? The Laika Compliance Distinction
This question surfaces regularly on r/soc2 and in enterprise procurement. The precise answer: it depends on which entity you mean.
Thoropass, Inc. is the software company. It builds the platform and employs the customer success team. It is not a CPA firm and does not issue SOC reports.
Laika Compliance, LLC dba Thoropass Assurance is the separate legal entity: an AICPA-registered, peer-reviewed CPA firm with its own engagement letter. It performs the attest function and issues your SOC 2 Type 2 report. Its team includes KPMG, EY, Coalfire, and RSM alumni with 100+ years combined experience. It also holds PCI QSAC status and is a HITRUST Accredited External Assessor.
The AICPA Code of Professional Conduct requires structural independence between the auditing CPA firm and the entity being audited. The standard mechanism for offering both platform and audit is exactly what Thoropass has done: create a separate legal entity for the CPA firm with its own engagement letter and independent AICPA peer review. The AICPA Peer Review program has reviewed and accepted this structure.
A thread on r/soc2 captured the common confusion: “Thoropass, formally, isn’t even a SOC2 auditor — they have their semi-separate Laika Compliance for that purpose.” This is half-right. Laika Compliance, LLC dba Thoropass Assurance is the auditor. Common ownership is precisely what the separate-entity structure manages under AICPA rules.
Some enterprise CISOs and audit committees require zero ownership overlap regardless of AICPA compliance. If your organization has that policy, confirm it before entering the sales process. See AICPA peer review and SOC 2 auditor quality for background.
How Thoropass Actually Works in 2026
The Connected Audit Model
From day 1, you meet your assigned auditor from Laika Compliance, LLC dba Thoropass Assurance — no third-party handoff. The auditor participates in kickoff, monitors evidence collection, and all audit communications happen inside the platform. This compresses the 30–60 day coordination phase typical of unbundled programs. Evidence requirements are designed by the auditor team, so what passes Thoropass’s automated tests is already in the auditor’s expected format. For multi-framework programs, running SOC 2 and HIPAA concurrently means a single observation window instead of two separate engagements.
First Pass AI
Thoropass launched First Pass AI as an opt-in preview for platform plus audit customers (thoropass.com/blog/first-pass-ai). Before submitted evidence reaches the auditor, an AI layer checks it for completeness (all required evidence present), consistency (matches your control descriptions), and timeliness (covers the correct observation period). Across the first 300+ audits using the system, average cycle dropped from 73 to 29 days — a 60% reduction — while reviewing 5,000+ pieces of evidence and executing 20,000+ automated QA checks. Targets at scale: 80% reduction in secondary auditor requests, 95% reduction in manual QA time. Caveat: the system is most effective when evidence is already standardized. Ad-hoc practices benefit from the pre-screening, but will surface more gaps earlier than teams expect.
Thoropass AI (the Broader Stack)
Beyond First Pass AI, Thoropass runs AI across two additional areas: security questionnaire automation (drafts answers to incoming vendor questionnaires from your control library, turning a multi-hour task into a review-and-approve workflow) and internal auditor support tooling (helps the Laika Compliance team process more engagements in parallel). Thoropass holds ISO 42001 certification for AI governance, and customer data is never used outside the specific audit engagement it was submitted for.
HITRUST MyCSF Two-Way Sync
Thoropass is a HITRUST Accredited External Assessor and authorized MyCSF reseller. HITRUST assessments require evidence inside the MyCSF portal, which runs separately from any GRC platform. Without the sync, you upload evidence twice — once to Thoropass, once to MyCSF. The two-way sync eliminates that: evidence flows automatically, and MyCSF status surfaces back in Thoropass. No other vendor in this series offers this depth of HITRUST integration. For healthcare, health insurers, and payment processors running HITRUST CSF alongside SOC 2, this can justify the platform selection on its own.
Continuous Monitoring and Auditor-Vetted Integrations
Thoropass’s 100+ integrations cover the standard AWS, GCP, Azure, Okta, GitHub, Jira, Rippling, Datadog, and CrowdStrike connections. What distinguishes them from a generic GRC platform: the evidence flows are auditor-vetted. Because Laika Compliance LLC is the auditing entity, the integration specs — what data gets pulled, what format, what timestamps — are defined by the same team that reviews the output. Evidence arrives pre-approved, which reduces rejection rates during fieldwork.
Onboarding and Ongoing Effort
The Onboarding Sprint (Weeks 1–3)
Typical onboarding runs 3–5 weeks. A customer success manager is assigned from day 1, paired with your Laika Compliance auditor for kickoff. Week 1: connect core integrations (AWS/GCP/Azure, Okta or Google Workspace, GitHub, Rippling). Each connection activates automated evidence collection and surfaces failing controls. Weeks 2–3: policy customization and gap remediation. Thoropass provides policy templates, but budget 4–8 hours per policy to customize against how your organization actually operates — generic templates draw pushback from experienced auditors. Single-framework programs on clean stacks sometimes complete onboarding in 1–2 weeks; multi-framework programs run closer to 5.
Gap Remediation and the Duplicate-Upload Friction
After the initial integration run, Thoropass surfaces failing controls with suggested remediations. Your team remediates; the platform re-tests. Standard GRC workflow.
The friction point that appears most consistently in G2 and AWS Marketplace reviews: some documents need to be uploaded twice — once during the readiness phase and again during the formal audit evidence submission. This is the most-cited UX gripe. Thoropass has improved the handoff between preparation and audit phases, and First Pass AI reduces back-and-forth on rejected evidence, but the issue persists for certain document classes. Ask about this specifically in your demo.
Long-Term Maintenance
After your first audit, the same CSM and auditor relationship carries forward. Continuous monitoring surfaces new failures; renewal audits run inside the same platform with the same Laika Compliance team. Price in advisory-tier upsells at renewal and mid-cycle framework additions — both should be quoted and locked in your initial contract.
Thoropass Pricing and Total Cost of Ownership (2026)
The Transparent AWS Marketplace Floor
Thoropass publishes its pricing on AWS Marketplace — rare in a category where most competitors quote only through sales calls. The public floor: $8,700/yr for the Platform Subscription (first framework included) and $5,800/yr for the SOC 2 Audit Subscription, a combined $14,500/yr minimum anchor. Use this as a budget starting point, not the expected final price — real-world deals land higher.
Verified Pricing Bands
- Vendr verified median: $30,728/yr (vendr.com/marketplace/thoropass).
- Zendikt: 25–100 employees ~$35K/yr; 100–300 employees ~$78K/yr.
- Valtik bundled estimate (platform plus Type 2 audit): $35K–$80K/yr for SMB.
- Thoropass own claim: 25–50% savings vs separate GRC platform plus independent audit firm.
Cost Drivers
Employee count (primary billing tier), framework count (each additional framework adds to both platform and audit subscription), advisory tier, and multi-framework concurrency. Multi-framework concurrent audits cost more than single-framework but less than two separate engagements.
Renewal Price Considerations
Renewal-creep complaints are less prominent in the Thoropass corpus than Vanta’s. Two known landmines: advisory-tier upsells at renewal (features bundled in Year 1 repriced as add-ons) and mid-cycle framework additions. Get framework roadmap additions quoted and locked in the initial contract rather than at the point you need them.
Bundled vs Unbundled TCO Table
| Cost Category | Thoropass (Bundled) | Vanta + Independent Auditor |
|---|---|---|
| Platform | $8,700–$30,000+/yr | $10,000–$80,000+/yr |
| External CPA audit | Included ($5,800–$30,000 subscription) | $15,000–$50,000 |
| Internal labor | $8,000–$20,000 | $10,000–$25,000 |
| Vendor coordination overhead | Low (1 vendor) | Medium (2 vendors) |
| Est. Year-1 Total | $22,500–$80,000 | $35,000–$155,000 |
The bundled TCO advantage is real when the audit is in scope. It narrows if procurement requires a separately contracted audit firm regardless. Model your scenario at /audit-cost-tool/ and see the SOC 2 audit cost guide for the unbundled baseline.
Thoropass vs Vanta vs Drata vs Secureframe vs Sprinto (2026 Comparison)
| Dimension | Thoropass | Vanta | Drata | Secureframe | Sprinto |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customers | 1,000+ | 15,000+ | 8,000+ | 6,000+ | 3,000+ |
| Integrations | ~100 | 400+ | 300+ | 300+ | 200+ |
| Frameworks | 30+ | 35+ | 20+ | 20+ | 200+ standards |
| Founded / HQ | 2019 / New York | 2018 / San Francisco | 2020 / San Diego + SF | 2020 / San Francisco | 2020 / Bengaluru + SF |
| Auditor Included | YES (Laika Compliance LLC) | No | No | No | No |
| G2 Rating | 4.7 (~575) | 4.6 (2,424) | 4.8 (1,100+) | 4.7 (700+) | 4.8 (1,300+) |
| Base Price | $8,700/yr + $5,800/yr audit | $10K–$15K | $7.5K–$15K | $10K–$35K | $8K–$10K |
| Enterprise Price | $35K–$80K (bundled) | $50K–$80K+ | $25K–$50K+ | $50K+ | $30K+ |
| Best For | Growth-stage; HITRUST + SOC 2; single vendor | Cloud-native SaaS, first SOC 2 | Growth-stage, multi-framework, support-sensitive | Complex/custom cloud setups | Budget-conscious startups |
The Auditor Included row is the decisive differentiator. Thoropass is the only vendor in this table that bundles a licensed, AICPA-peer-reviewed CPA firm. Every other vendor requires a separate audit engagement at $15K–$50K on top of the platform fee.
Thoropass loses ground on integration breadth (~100 vs Vanta’s 400+) and customer scale (1,000+ vs Vanta’s 15,000+). For a full head-to-head, see our Vanta review and Vanta alternatives hub. For Drata and Sprinto alternatives, see /insights/sprinto-alternatives/.
Real User Sentiment (G2 / Reddit / Glassdoor 2026)
What G2 Says
Thoropass holds 4.7 out of 5 across approximately 575 reviews on G2 as of 2026-Q2. Quality of Support 9.6/10 — highest in the category (Vanta: 9.0). Audit Trail 9.0 beats Vanta (8.7). Praise pattern: feels like a dedicated compliance officer; auditors told customers it was the easiest audit they had conducted. Critical themes: UI clutter at scale, duplicate-upload friction, and integration breadth gaps vs Vanta/Drata. Rep turnover appears in a handful of reviews as a CSM continuity concern.
What Reddit Says
The r/soc2 community’s skepticism centers on the auditor-independence question. The quote that surfaces most: “Thoropass, formally, isn’t even a SOC2 auditor — they have their semi-separate Laika Compliance for that purpose.” This is half-right: Laika Compliance, LLC dba Thoropass Assurance is the AICPA-registered CPA firm, not the Thoropass brand. The r/soc2 sentiment reflects genuine uncertainty about the structure rather than a compliance problem with it. Buyers who ask directly about the Laika Compliance LLC entity typically come away satisfied.
Glassdoor Signal
Thoropass shows 3.6 out of 5 across 88 Glassdoor reviews as of 2026. Taken alongside the -4.1% YoY headcount reduction and no disclosed Series C, this is a soft proxy for capital trajectory. None of these signals are individually disqualifying for a 1–3 year engagement. For buyers running a formal 5-year vendor-risk assessment, they represent a legitimate data point to weigh alongside the platform’s functional strengths.
How Thoropass Works With (and Without) Your Existing GRC Stack
The Thoropass audit module is available standalone. Companies that already have Vanta or Drata in place for controls monitoring can engage Thoropass — specifically, Laika Compliance, LLC dba Thoropass Assurance — purely as their audit firm (thoropass.com/platform/it-security-audit). Evidence exported from Vanta or Drata can be uploaded into the engagement, and First Pass AI pre-screens it before auditor review. This matters for buyers mid-contract on a GRC platform who are dissatisfied with their current audit firm but do not want a full migration. It also creates a low-friction evaluation path: run one audit through Thoropass while keeping your existing platform, then decide whether to consolidate in Year 2 based on the audit experience.
Decision Framework: Should You Pick Thoropass?
1. Do you want one vendor or two for software plus audit?
Thoropass’s bundled model — one contract, one CSM, one audit firm, one platform — eliminates the coordination layer that adds 30–60 days to unbundled programs. When your GRC platform and your auditor are the same team, evidence requirements are designed together and communications stay in one place. If that consolidation fits your procurement model and your audit committee’s independence stance, Thoropass should be your first evaluation. If you have reasons to keep vendors separate — existing contracts, auditor preferences, enterprise policy — Vanta or Drata plus an independent CPA firm is the more appropriate path.
2. Will your audit committee or procurement flag same-vendor independence?
Get the answer to this before you enter the Thoropass sales process. The Laika Compliance LLC structure satisfies AICPA independence requirements — this is documented and not in dispute within the accounting profession. The question is whether your organization’s internal policies go further. Financial services companies and public companies often require the audit firm to be fully arms-length from any technology vendor with a commercial relationship with the auditee. If your committee has that policy, Thoropass requires a written exception before you can proceed. Determine that upfront rather than at the end of a sales cycle.
3. Are you pursuing HITRUST CSF or PCI DSS alongside SOC 2?
If your roadmap includes HITRUST CSF (e1, i1, or r2) or PCI DSS 4.0 alongside SOC 2, Thoropass is the most credentialed single-vendor option in this category. HITRUST Accredited External Assessor status, authorized MyCSF reseller status, two-way MyCSF sync, and PCI QSAC credential are all held by the assurance entity. No other platform in this series holds this combination. For healthcare technology companies and payment processors, the HITRUST efficiency advantage alone can justify the selection even before the bundled SOC 2 audit factors in. If your roadmap is single-framework SOC 2 on a standard SaaS stack, Vanta’s broader integration library is likely the better fit.
4. Do you have an internal compliance lead, or do you need advisory-as-a-service?
Thoropass reviews consistently describe the platform as feeling like hiring a dedicated compliance officer. That reflects the advisory layer built into the bundled model — your CSM and auditor together provide guidance beyond what a platform-only tool surfaces. For companies without an internal compliance function (common at Series A–B), this is a meaningful part of the value. For teams with an experienced CISO who just need evidence automation, some of the bundled advisory is redundant. Ask during the sales process exactly what the advisory tier includes and whether you would pay for it at renewal.
Thoropass FAQ
Is Thoropass an auditor?
Yes and no. Thoropass, Inc. is the software company — it does not issue SOC reports. Laika Compliance, LLC dba Thoropass Assurance is the separate legal entity that does: an AICPA-registered, peer-reviewed CPA firm that holds its own engagement letter and signs your SOC report. Both share common ownership and operate under the Thoropass brand, but the CPA firm is legally distinct with its own independence structure, reviewed and accepted by the AICPA Peer Review program. Some enterprise procurement policies require a fully arms-length audit firm regardless — confirm your committee’s stance before proceeding.
How much does Thoropass cost per year?
The AWS Marketplace public floor is $8,700/yr for the platform subscription (first framework included) plus $5,800/yr for the SOC 2 Audit Subscription — a combined $14,500/yr minimum anchor. Real-world deals average $30,728/yr per Vendr data. Companies with 25–100 employees typically pay around $35K; 100–300 employees around $78K (Zendikt data). Bundled platform plus Type 2 audit commonly runs $35K–$80K for SMB organizations. Exact pricing depends on employee count, framework count, advisory tier, and whether you are running multi-framework concurrent audits. Use our SOC 2 audit cost tool to model your scenario.
Does Thoropass include the SOC 2 audit?
Yes. The SOC 2 Audit Subscription (starting at $5,800/yr on AWS Marketplace) is a separate line item but comes from the same vendor relationship: Laika Compliance, LLC dba Thoropass Assurance, an AICPA peer-reviewed CPA firm. This is Thoropass’s defining differentiator versus every other platform in this review series. You do not engage a separate audit firm. The audit is conducted inside the Thoropass platform, and First Pass AI pre-screens evidence before auditor review, cutting the average cycle from 73 to 29 days.
How long does it take to implement Thoropass?
Typical onboarding runs 3–5 weeks from contract signature to audit-ready controls. Some single-framework programs on clean stacks have reached readiness in 1–2 weeks in best-case scenarios. Multi-framework concurrent programs run closer to 5 weeks. A customer success manager is paired from day 1. Once controls are in place and the observation period begins, the SOC 2 Type 2 audit requires a minimum 3-month observation window — commonly 6 months for a full-year report. Use the SOC 2 timeline calculator to model your specific scenario.
What is First Pass AI?
First Pass AI is Thoropass’s evidence pre-screening system (opt-in preview). Before submitted evidence reaches the auditor, it checks for completeness, consistency, and timeliness. Across 300+ audits, Thoropass reports cutting average cycles from 73 days to 29 days — a 60% reduction — reviewing 5,000+ evidence pieces and running 20,000+ automated QA checks. Targets at scale: 80% reduction in secondary auditor requests, 95% reduction in manual QA time. ISO 42001 certified for AI governance; customer data never used outside the engagement. Details at thoropass.com/blog/first-pass-ai.
How does Thoropass compare to Vanta?
The core difference: Thoropass bundles the audit; Vanta does not. Vanta has 400+ integrations vs Thoropass’s ~100, and 15,000+ customers vs 1,000+. Thoropass G2 score (4.7) edges Vanta (4.6), and Quality of Support (9.6 vs 9.0) is the category leader. Choose Vanta for integration breadth or auditor flexibility. Choose Thoropass for a single vendor covering software plus audit, HITRUST CSF, or First Pass AI cycle compression. See our Vanta review.
Is Thoropass’s audit independent?
Structurally, yes. The audit is issued by Laika Compliance, LLC dba Thoropass Assurance — a legally separate entity with its own engagement letter, AICPA peer review registration, and independence affirmations. This is the standard AICPA mechanism for this type of arrangement. Whether it satisfies your enterprise procurement policy is a separate question: some organizations require zero common ownership between audit firm and GRC platform vendor, going beyond the AICPA baseline. That is legitimate and not uncommon in regulated industries. Confirm your committee’s position before signing.
What frameworks does Thoropass support?
Thoropass supports 30+ frameworks including SOC 1, SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27018, ISO 42001, HIPAA, HITRUST CSF (e1/i1/r2), PCI DSS 4.0, GDPR, Cyber Essentials, CMMC Level 1, and NIST CSF 2.0. Multi-framework concurrent audits are supported — SOC 2 plus HIPAA in a single engagement is a common use case. The HITRUST MyCSF two-way sync and HITRUST Accredited Assessor status make Thoropass the strongest single-vendor option for programs that include HITRUST CSF alongside SOC 2. See the full compliance software directory for side-by-side framework coverage across platforms.
Final Verdict
Thoropass is the right choice for growth-stage companies and regulated organizations that want a single vendor for both compliance automation and the SOC 2 audit. G2 Quality of Support 9.6/10 (highest in the category) and a First Pass AI system that cut average cycles from 73 to 29 days back up the connected-audit premise. For HITRUST CSF alongside SOC 2, it is the most credentialed single-vendor option in the market.
It is not the right choice if procurement requires a fully independent audit firm with zero common ownership, if you need 300+ integrations, or if the $30K+ deal median is a stretch. In those cases, Vanta (integration breadth), Drata (support quality), or Sprinto (lower entry cost) are worth evaluating. See the /best-soc-2-auditors/ directory for vetted audit firms if you are evaluating independent options.
The bundled model is a structural change in how compliance programs run. When the auditor is present from day 1, evidence requirements are built for the audit from the start. Whether that advantage outweighs the tradeoffs on integration breadth and independence flexibility depends on your constraints. Go in with both questions on the table.
Ready to find the right audit partner for your compliance program? At SOC2Auditors, we match you with vetted firms with real pricing, timelines, and satisfaction scores. Get three tailored matches in 24 hours.
Comparing SOC 2 software? See our side-by-side breakdown of all 12 compliance platforms — pricing, best-for, and what each one gets wrong. Independent editorial, no pay-to-rank.