On this page
- Understanding the Role of an ISO Certification Consultant from a SOC 2 Perspective
- How ISO 27001 Helps With SOC 2 Readiness
- The Consultant Engagement: From Gap Analysis to Certification Audit
- Common Pitfalls to Avoid in Your ISO 27001 Project
- How ISO 27001:2022 Impacts Your SOC 2 Readiness
- How to Select the Right ISO Certification Consultant
- Budgeting for Your ISO Consulting Engagement
- How to Onboard Your Consultant
- ISO 27001 vs. SOC 2: Build Once, Report Twice
- The Strategic Connection Between ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Readiness
An ISO certification consultant is an external specialist contracted to prepare an organization for an official audit against a standard from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Their function is to analyze existing processes, identify gaps against the standard’s requirements, and guide the implementation of a compliant management system. They provide project management and technical expertise, and help build the auditable evidence certification requires.
Understanding the Role of an ISO Certification Consultant from a SOC 2 Perspective

An ISO consultant works as a project manager and subject matter expert. The job is to implement a management system that meets a specific ISO standard and prepare the organization for the certification audit. For a company pursuing a SOC 2 report, the value of an ISO consultant, particularly one specializing in ISO 27001, is the ability to build a formal Information Security Management System (ISMS). An ISMS is the documented framework of policies, procedures, and controls that manage information security. This ISMS produces evidence that supports many of the AICPA’s Trust Services Criteria, so less has to be built from scratch for the SOC 2 audit. Our compliance framework comparison sets ISO 27001 and SOC 2 against the other frameworks.

Core Services of ISO Certification Consultants
A typical engagement with an ISO consultant has four parts, each producing auditable evidence that supports both ISO certification and SOC 2 compliance.
- Gap Analysis: This is the initial diagnostic phase. The consultant assesses your current security posture against the specific clauses and controls of the ISO standard. For a SOC 2-focused organization, this analysis surfaces control gaps that would likely lead to findings in a SOC 2 audit, such as inadequate risk assessment processes (violating CC3.1) or missing change management procedures (violating CC8.1).
- Risk Assessment and Treatment: Risk management is the cornerstone of ISO 27001. A consultant guides you through the formal process of identifying information assets, analyzing threats and vulnerabilities, and developing a risk treatment plan. This process generates the evidence needed to satisfy the SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria CC3.1 (Risk Identification and Assessment) and CC3.4 (Risk Response).
- Documentation Development: The consultant assists in creating the extensive documentation required by the standard. This includes drafting the high-level ISMS scope, the information security policy, and operational procedures for controls like access management and incident response. This documentation is the primary evidence set for a SOC 2 auditor to review.
- Internal Audits: Before the certification audit, the consultant conducts an internal audit to simulate the real event. This process identifies non-conformities and areas of weakness, providing an opportunity for remediation. It does the same job as a SOC 2 readiness assessment: it uncovers issues before the external auditor arrives.
An ISO consultant’s role is to build a demonstrably effective security program. By conducting a pre-assessment internal audit, they identify and help fix control failures that would otherwise become exceptions or qualifications in a SOC 2 report.
The Consultant vs. The Registrar
The consultant and the registrar (also known as a Certification Body) have separate duties. The separation prevents conflicts of interest and protects the integrity of the certification process.
| Role | ISO Certification Consultant | ISO Registrar (Certification Body) |
|---|---|---|
| Function | Advisory & Implementation: Guides the design, build, and implementation of the management system. | Audit & Certification: Independently tests the management system against the standard and issues the certificate. |
| Goal | To ensure your management system is ready for and successfully passes the audit. | To provide an objective, impartial verification that the system conforms to the standard. |
| Relationship | A collaborative partner and subject matter expert embedded with your team. | An independent, third-party assessor. |
For a company preparing for SOC 2 audit readiness, the documented ISMS built with the consultant is an evidence base for the SOC 2 audit. For instance, the formal risk assessment report and Statement of Applicability (SoA) developed for ISO 27001 map to SOC 2’s CC3.2, which requires that “The entity analyzes risks to the achievement of its objectives.” By using an ISO consultant to build the ISMS, you also generate control evidence a CPA firm will ask for in your SOC 2 examination.
How ISO 27001 Helps With SOC 2 Readiness

Pursuing ISO 27001 certification before a SOC 2 audit overlaps heavily with SOC 2 work rather than duplicating it. The Information Security Management System (ISMS) required for ISO 27001 provides the policies, procedures, technical controls, and auditable evidence that a SOC 2 examination also draws on. You build one security program that supports both audits.
Mapping Core Controls Between Frameworks
The most significant overlap exists between the ISO 27001 Annex A controls and the SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria, particularly the Security criterion (Common Criteria). The Common Criteria are mandatory for all SOC 2 reports, so ISO 27001 certification first gives a head start. The risk management process central to ISO 27001 (identifying assets, threats, and vulnerabilities, then creating a risk treatment plan) implements the principles in the SOC 2 CC3 series on Risk Assessment.
When an ISO consultant helps you develop a formal risk assessment methodology, a risk register, and a Statement of Applicability (SoA) for ISO 27001, you are simultaneously creating the exact evidence needed by a SOC 2 auditor to test controls like CC3.1 (Risk Identification) and CC3.4 (Risk Response). That work can cover the risk assessment your SOC 2 audit needs, so you do not have to perform and document a separate one.
Practical Overlaps That Save Time and Money
The alignment extends beyond risk management. Nearly every control domain in ISO 27001’s Annex A corresponds to specific requirements within the SOC 2 Common Criteria, so one set of work can serve both audits and reduce redundant evidence collection.
The table shows how implementing ISO 27001 Annex A controls generates evidence for a SOC 2 audit.
Mapping ISO 27001 Controls to SOC 2 Criteria
| ISO 27001 Annex A Control Domain | Relevant SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria | SOC 2 Relevance Explained |
|---|---|---|
| A.5 Organizational Controls | CC1 (Control Environment), CC2 (Communication) | The policies, defined roles, and responsibilities required by A.5 directly demonstrate the “tone at the top” and commitment to integrity and ethical values that form the basis of CC1.1. |
| A.6 People Controls | CC1.2 (Board Oversight), CC2.2 (Internal Communication) | Controls for screening, onboarding (A.6.3), and security awareness training (A.6.4) provide the exact evidence needed to satisfy SOC 2 criteria related to HR security and demonstrating a competent workforce. |
| A.7 Physical Controls | CC6.3 (Physical Access), CC7.3 (Environmental Protection) | Requirements for secure areas, entry controls, and protection against environmental threats directly map to SOC 2 criteria for restricting physical access to facilities and protecting against environmental hazards. |
| A.8 Technological Controls | CC6 (Logical Access), CC7 (System Operations) | Controls for access control (A.8.2), cryptography (A.8.24), and change management (A.8.32) satisfy a large portion of the technical controls audited in SOC 2, including CC6.1, CC7.1, and CC8.1. |
Defining, documenting, and implementing these Annex A controls with ISO certification consultants produces an auditable security program that also supplies evidence for a SOC 2 examination.
The Consultant Engagement: From Gap Analysis to Certification Audit
An ISO consulting engagement is a project in four phases that builds an Information Security Management System (ISMS) capable of passing a formal audit and lays the groundwork for a SOC 2 report.
The global ISO certification market, valued at USD 30,931.2 million in 2026 and projected to reach USD 80,786.9 million by 2033 with a 14.7% CAGR, according to BrandEssenceResearch.com.
Phase 1: Scoping and Gap Analysis
The initial phase focuses on defining the project’s boundaries. The consultant works with your leadership and system owners to establish the scope of the ISMS: which people, processes, systems, and locations will be included in the audit. A poorly defined scope can lead to audit failures or unnecessary work. Following scoping, the consultant performs a gap analysis, comparing your current security practices against each requirement of the ISO 27001 standard. The deliverable is a detailed, prioritized action plan that drives the rest of the project.
The ISMS scope definition directly informs the “system description” for your future SOC 2 report, which defines what the auditor will examine. The gap analysis identifies control weaknesses that would manifest as exceptions in a SOC 2 audit, such as a lack of formal vendor risk management (CC9.2) or insufficient incident response testing (CC7.3), so you can remediate them early.
Phase 2: Implementation and Remediation
Using the gap analysis as a guide, the consultant advises on building missing components and remediating identified weaknesses. This involves a combination of policy writing, process design, and advising on technical control implementation.
Key activities include:
- Developing Core Documentation: Creating the foundational ISMS documents, such as the Information Security Policy, Risk Assessment Methodology, and the Statement of Applicability (SoA).
- Guiding Control Implementation: Advising as your teams implement technical and procedural controls, from access control workflows to backup and recovery procedures.
- Systematic Remediation: Addressing each gap identified in Phase 1, with the consultant providing templates and expertise to ensure solutions are both compliant and practical for your business.
For example, when a consultant helps your engineering team formalize a change management process, they check it meets ISO 27001 Annex A.8.32 (Change Management). This work also generates the evidence (such as change request logs and testing approvals) needed to satisfy SOC 2’s CC8.1, which requires changes to be authorized, designed, tested, and implemented to meet the entity’s objectives.
Phase 3: Internal Audit and Management Review
Before the external certification audit, the consultant runs a full dress rehearsal: an internal audit of the newly implemented ISMS, testing controls and reviewing documentation to identify any non-conformities or areas for improvement. This is followed by a formal management review meeting, where the consultant presents the internal audit findings, ISMS performance metrics, and any residual risks to the leadership team for discussion and action.
This phase is the direct equivalent of a SOC 2 readiness assessment. The internal audit is designed to find and fix the same types of issues a SOC 2 auditor would, such as inconsistent application of a policy or failure to produce evidence for a specific control. It lets you remediate issues before they affect your formal SOC 2 examination.
Phase 4: Certification Audit Support
With the ISMS built, tested, and refined, the final step is the two-stage certification audit conducted by an independent, accredited registrar. The consultant’s role shifts from implementer to advocate and guide. They prepare your team for auditor interviews, ensure all required evidence is organized and accessible, and assist in formulating responses to any auditor inquiries or findings.
Going through an ISO 27001 certification audit gives your team practice preparing for, participating in, and responding to auditor requests. The controls, documentation, and auditable evidence the project produces are the same material a SOC 2 report rests on.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid in Your ISO 27001 Project
Three mistakes commonly derail an ISO 27001 project, especially one with a parallel SOC 2 goal.
The “Shelfware ISMS” Trap. The most frequent error is treating ISO 27001 as a documentation exercise, creating an ISMS that exists only on paper and is disconnected from actual operations. This risks a failed Stage 2 audit and gives little to a SOC 2 Type 2 report, which requires evidence of controls operating effectively over time. Under ISO 27001:2022, auditors look for proof that your ISMS is embedded in how you operate every day, not just a binder on a shelf.
Improper Scoping. Narrowing the ISMS boundary to exclude key systems or departments to simplify the ISO audit can render a subsequent SOC 2 report incomplete or irrelevant to key customers. From a SOC 2 perspective, the system in scope must align with the services being reported on. Scope decisions made purely to ease the ISO certification process can cause problems when the SOC 2 audit begins.
Underestimating Internal Ownership. An ISMS that belongs entirely to the consultant is likely to fail its first surveillance audit. The standard requires continual improvement and ongoing management, which must be owned internally. Organizations that treat the engagement as a handoff rather than a knowledge transfer end up unable to maintain the ISMS after the consultant departs.

A SOC 2 Type 2 report specifically attests to the operating effectiveness of controls over a period. By building an operationally integrated ISMS to satisfy ISO 27001:2022 auditors, you also produce evidence a SOC 2 Type 2 audit can use. The artifacts from a well-run ISMS (risk assessments, internal audit reports, and management review minutes) show that your security program is actively managed.
How ISO 27001:2022 Impacts Your SOC 2 Readiness
The ISO 27001:2022 revision changes how an ISMS is implemented and how it aligns with SOC 2. The Annex A controls were consolidated from 114 to 93 and reorganized into four themes. The mandatory transition deadline for all existing certifications was October 31, 2025. An organization still operating under the 2013 standard should treat re-certification to ISO 27001:2022 as urgent. Konfirmity has a full rundown of what changed in the 2022 revision. Our ISO 27002 vs ISO 27001 guide explains how the control guidance relates to the certifiable standard.
For an organization pursuing SOC 2, the new structure makes control mapping easier: the four themes line up more readily with the Trust Services Criteria than the previous structure did.
- Organizational Controls (37): Cover governance, policies, and roles. They supply evidence for the SOC 2 control environment (CC1 series) and risk assessment (CC3 series).
- People Controls (8): Address HR security across the employee lifecycle and map to logical access and HR-related controls within the CC2 and CC6 series.
- Physical Controls (14): Govern physical security and environmental protections, and align with physical access controls in CC6.4.
- Technological Controls (34): Cover technical measures like access control, cryptography, and network security, and map to the bulk of technical controls in CC6 and CC7 (e.g., CC6.1, CC6.3, CC7.1).
When your consultant implements controls under the 2022 structure, the mapping artifacts they produce translate more cleanly to SOC 2 criteria categories. Evidence collected for Organizational Controls slots directly into CC1 and CC3 testing; evidence collected for Technological Controls covers the majority of CC6 and CC7 requirements. That means fewer custom cross-references and less rework when the SOC 2 audit begins.
The 2022 auditor mindset shift: Auditors under the revised standard ask for proof that your ISMS is operationally integrated, not only designed on paper. A SOC 2 Type 2 report requires similar proof of operating effectiveness over time, so evidence of how the ISMS runs serves both audits.
How to Select the Right ISO Certification Consultant
When SOC 2 is also a goal, the consultant you pick shapes the ISMS your SOC 2 audit will reuse. A consultant with experience in both frameworks can build an ISMS that makes your future SOC 2 audit more efficient and less costly.

Vetting for Integrated Compliance Expertise
If you want both ISO 27001 and SOC 2, vet for consultants who can show experience harmonizing the two frameworks rather than treating them as separate projects.
Actionable RFP Questions to Ask:
- “Describe your methodology for mapping ISO 27001 Annex A controls to the SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria to minimize redundant evidence collection.”
- “Provide a sanitized example of a risk assessment report you have prepared that was successfully used for both an ISO 27001 and a SOC 2 audit.”
- “What is your strategy for evidence collection in a cloud-native environment (e.g., AWS, Azure) to simultaneously satisfy both ISO 27001 and SOC 2 requirements?”
- “Walk us through a project where you guided a company of our size and industry through ISO 27001 certification, followed by a successful SOC 2 Type 2 attestation. What were the key challenges and how did you address them?”
These questions ask for concrete proof of experience. Expert consultation services can help you refine your requirements for a dual-purpose engagement.
ISO 27001 Service Provider Comparison
The type of firm you choose affects cost, speed, and how easily you can pursue SOC 2 in parallel. The table compares three provider types.

| Provider Type | Typical Cost Range | Approach | Best For SOC 2 Readiness |
|---|---|---|---|
| Big Four Audit Firm | $70K - $150K+ | Formal, with ISO and SOC 2 often run as separate engagements by separate teams. | Varies. Higher cost, and you may work with two teams. Ask how evidence is shared across the two engagements. |
| Boutique Cybersecurity Consultancy | $40K - $80K | Hands-on, specialized. Can be excellent but may lack a licensed CPA arm for the SOC 2 attestation. | Good, but limited. Great for ISO 27001 prep, but you will still need to hire a separate CPA firm for the SOC 2 audit itself. |
| Integrated Audit Firm (CPA + ISO) | $50K - $90K | Unified. One team of cross-trained auditors can handle both frameworks under one SOW. | Can work well. One team and one SOW can mean less duplicated evidence work. Confirm the firm’s audit and certification work stays separate from any advisory work it does for you. |
A partner who specializes in integrated audits can find efficiencies from scoping through certification. By mapping controls once and collecting evidence once, organizations can reduce the engineering and GRC team effort compared to running separate audits.
Critical Red Flags to Watch For
These signs suggest a consultant lacks the depth for an integrated audit strategy.
A consultant who guarantees certification is an immediate red flag. Certification is the outcome of an independent audit and cannot be guaranteed. A guarantee suggests the consultant misunderstands the process or puts sales ahead of professional integrity.
Other warning signs include:
- The “Template Dump” Approach: If their proposal involves providing a generic set of document templates with minimal customization, they are selling templates, not consulting. A useful consultant tailors the ISMS to your specific business processes, technology stack, and risk profile.
- Lack of Technical Fluency: If they cannot discuss the security features and configuration of your core technology stack (e.g., AWS IAM, Azure Active Directory, GitHub branch protection rules), they cannot provide practical, actionable advice for implementing technical controls.
- No Relevant Client Experience: A consultant whose experience is primarily with large, non-tech enterprises will struggle to adapt to the agile environment of a SaaS company. Their client history should include organizations similar to yours in size, industry, and technical maturity.
Our guide to selecting SOC 2 compliance consultants covers choosing a compliance partner more broadly.
An effective ISO consultant builds the security program and evidence your SOC 2 auditor will request (CC3.2 (Risk Analysis), CC6.1 (Logical Access Control), and related controls) using ISO 27001 as the implementation framework. Policies, risk assessments, and control evidence from the ISMS are the same artifacts a CPA firm tests during SOC 2 fieldwork.
Budgeting for Your ISO Consulting Engagement
Consulting is only one line in the total budget. The independent certification body charges separately for Stage 1, Stage 2, surveillance, and recertification. Use the ISO 27001 certification cost guide to keep those lifecycle charges distinct, then compare evidenced ISO 27001 certification companies when you are ready to select the organization that will audit the ISMS and issue the certificate.
Budgeting for an ISO certification project requires accounting for consultant fees, certification body charges, and the internal time required. A common pitfall is underestimating the internal effort needed to build a certifiable Information Security Management System (ISMS), especially if starting from a low-maturity security posture. The process involves extensive documentation, potential technology implementation, employee training, and internal audits that must be completed before the formal certification audit begins.
Breaking Down the Costs and Timelines
A budget needs three cost categories. Missing any one can cause delays and overruns.
- Consulting and Readiness Fees: This covers the expert guidance from a firm to perform a gap analysis, assist with risk assessment, develop ISMS documentation (policies, procedures), and prepare your team for the certification audit. This phase is where the foundation for SOC 2 evidence is built.
- Certification Body Audit Fees: These are paid to the separate, accredited registrar that conducts the official Stage 1 (documentation review) and Stage 2 (substantive testing) audits and issues the ISO 27001 certificate.
- Ongoing Surveillance Audit Fees: ISO 27001 certification is valid for three years, contingent upon successful annual surveillance audits in years two and three. These audits ensure the ISMS remains effective and are a required cost to maintain certification.
Cost trend: HighTable, a UK ISO 27001 toolkit vendor, reports that UK ISO 27001 auditor day rates rose about 20% in 2026 to roughly £1,500, which it attributes to a shortage of accredited auditors. The figure is the vendor’s own and is not independently sourced. Build that into the budget now.
An ISO project can stall because the team’s time was never planned for. Budget internal time as carefully as external fees. That time also builds the operating discipline and evidence base your SOC 2 audit will need.
The table below gives estimates for an ISO 27001 project. A consultant with deep SOC 2 expertise may charge a premium, which can be offset by less redundant work across both audits.
Estimated ISO 27001 Consulting Costs and Timelines by Company Size (2026)
| Company Profile | Estimated Consulting Fees | Estimated Timeline to Certification | Key Influencing Factors |
|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS Startup (15-50 Employees) | $25,000 - $50,000+ | 6 - 9 Months | Low initial security maturity, limited internal resources, and a narrowly defined ISMS scope. |
| Mid-Market Tech (50-250 Employees) | $50,000 - $90,000+ | 9 - 12 Months | Moderate existing security controls but requires significant documentation and process formalization. |
| Enterprise (250+ Employees) | $90,000 - $150,000+ | 12 - 18+ Months | Complex environment with multiple business units, legacy systems, and a broader ISMS scope. |
Aligning ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Timelines
For organizations pursuing both ISO 27001 and SOC 2, scheduling matters for avoiding redundant testing and evidence collection. One approach is to schedule your ISO 27001 Stage 2 certification audit to conclude immediately before your SOC 2 Type 2 observation period begins.
This timing allows the ISO 27001 audit report and its underlying evidence, including the risk assessment, Statement of Applicability, and internal audit reports, to serve as the baseline for the SOC 2 audit. It supports SOC 2 requirements like CC3.2 (Risk Assessment) and CC5.1 (Monitoring Activities). This approach turns two separate projects into one sequence and reduces the burden on internal teams.
The ISMS you build for ISO 27001 produces evidence the SOC 2 Common Criteria require. For example, the risk assessment activities conducted to satisfy ISO 27001 clauses 6.1.2 & 8.2 generate the risk register and treatment plan needed to address SOC 2’s CC3 series on Risk Assessment. A consultant who understands both frameworks can consolidate this into one effort.
How to Onboard Your Consultant
A skilled ISO consultant delivers value only if onboarding aligns expectations, grants the necessary access and authority, and fits the consultant into your workflow. A flawed onboarding leads to friction and delays. Start by assigning a dedicated internal project lead as the consultant’s primary point of contact and internal advocate, responsible for clearing roadblocks and arranging access to the people the consultant needs to interview.
Setting Up the Engagement
Once the project lead is named, set up the working basics. An initial onboarding checklist:
- Grant System Access: Provide the consultant with role-based, least-privilege access to necessary systems, such as your cloud console (read-only), source code repositories, and HRIS platform.
- Establish Communication Channels: Create a dedicated project management space in a tool like Asana or Jira for task tracking and a shared channel in Slack or Teams for real-time communication.
- Schedule Stakeholder Kick-Offs: Arrange initial meetings between the consultant and key department heads (e.g., Engineering, IT, HR, Legal) to establish rapport and provide organizational context.
Preparing Your Internal Teams
A common failure point is not preparing internal teams for the consultant’s arrival. Employees may view the consultant as an external auditor, leading to defensive and uncooperative interactions. Present the consultant as a collaborator whose goal is to strengthen the company’s security posture and prepare it for the audit.
Set clear expectations regarding the time commitment required from your teams. Communicate that the project is a company-wide priority and that prompt participation in interviews and evidence provision is expected. This prevents the consultant from becoming an administrative bottleneck and gives teams practice collaborating across functions, which a SOC 2 audit also needs.
For instance, when the consultant needs to review the employee onboarding process, explain to HR that the objective is to ensure alignment with ISO 27001 Annex A.6.3 (Information security in the onboarding process), which also provides evidence for SOC 2 controls related to workforce conduct. This framing makes it a process review rather than an interrogation. The stakeholders involved in the ISO 27001 project, from engineers managing cloud access to HR overseeing background checks, are the same individuals who will be central to your future SOC 2 audit. Onboarding the consultant well also works as a dry run for the SOC 2 examination.
ISO 27001 vs. SOC 2: Build Once, Report Twice
Organizations often treat ISO 27001 and SOC 2 as two independent compliance obligations. The deliverables differ (ISO 27001 is a certification of a management system, while SOC 2 is an attestation report on controls), but both are built on the same foundational security principles and control activities.
One way to split the two: ISO 27001 builds and formalizes the security program (the ISMS), and SOC 2 has an independent auditor report on the effectiveness of that program’s controls. If the ISMS is built correctly for ISO 27001, the SOC 2 audit validates work already completed.
How ISO 27001 Work Directly Feeds Your SOC 2 Audit
The work performed to establish an ISO 27001-compliant ISMS produces much of the evidence SOC 2 auditors ask for. That overlap reduces redundant evidence collection.
The main overlaps:
| ISO 27001 Work Product | SOC 2 Criteria Satisfied | How It Maps |
|---|---|---|
| Risk Assessment & Treatment Plan (Clause 6) | CC3.1, CC3.2 | The formal risk assessment methodology and Risk Treatment Plan directly satisfy the requirements for risk identification and analysis. |
| Policies and Procedures (Annex A) | CC1 series | The comprehensive set of policies developed for the ISMS — access control policy, incident response plan, data classification policy — serve as primary documentary evidence for the SOC 2 auditor to evaluate control design. |
| Internal Audit Program (Clause 9.2) | CC5.1 | The mandatory ISO 27001 internal audit program and subsequent corrective actions provide tangible evidence of ongoing monitoring activities, directly supporting the Monitoring Activities criterion. |
An ISO 27001 certification rests on a documented, operating security program, which is much of what a SOC 2 audit tests.
Chainlink is one company that achieved both ISO 27001 certification and a SOC 2 attestation.
The Strategic Connection Between ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Readiness
ISO 27001 certification with the guidance of a knowledgeable consultant gives you much of what a SOC 2 report needs. The Information Security Management System (ISMS) you build is a functioning, auditable security program. That program and its evidence (the policies, procedures, risk assessments, and internal audit reports) are what a SOC 2 auditor will examine to test the controls described in your system description. An ISO certification consultant with expertise in both frameworks can design each control implemented for ISO 27001 to also satisfy a corresponding SOC 2 requirement. You can compare ISO 27001 consultants that run both frameworks side by side.
For example, the procedures developed to manage user access rights under ISO 27001’s Annex A.5.15 (Access control) and A.5.18 (Access rights) directly generate the evidence needed to demonstrate compliance with SOC 2’s CC6.2 and CC6.3, which cover the authorization, modification, and periodic review of access to data and systems. Using the ISO 27001 framework builds the control environment and evidence library required for SOC 2 audit readiness without redoing the work.
Finding the right auditor is as critical as building the right controls. SOC2Auditors is a comparison platform that provides verified pricing and timelines across our auditor directory, helping you find the right partner for your SOC 2 audit without the sales calls. Get three tailored matches.
More in Framework Comparisons