Menu
Cybersecurity and compliance management platform (multi-framework GRC, heavily MSSP/MSP-channel) · verified
Apptega
Apptega's own public trust/security page (security.apptega.com) runs on Conveyor, a rival trust-center vendor, so the company does not offer a customer-facing trust-center module of its own alongside its GRC platform.
An independent MSP-community discussion pushed back on Apptega's own MSP-purpose-built positioning, with one practitioner describing it as 'a GRC platform built more for an internal compliance team' rather than a lightweight MSP tool. SAML-based single sign-on is gated to the Plus and Premium tiers (not the entry Essentials plan), and no SCIM support is published on the pricing page.
Desk research against public sources. Every figure below carries its source and the date we retrieved it.
What Apptega does.
Seven capabilities, graded the same way for every platform in the directory. "Not established" means we looked and could not confirm it, not that the feature is missing.
| Capability | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Automated evidence collection | Partial | Vendor claims automated evidence sync via a 'library of 16+ connectors'; an independent MSP-practitioner discussion describes the product as more assessment/questionnaire-driven than a fully automated evidence-pull tool (see Reddit source). Source |
| Auditor workspace | Yes | Dedicated 'Audit Manager' module: 'Speed prep, share evidence & validate controls.' Source |
| Trust center | No | Apptega's own public security/trust page is 'Powered by Conveyor,' a competing trust-center vendor; no customer-facing trust-center module is listed among Apptega's own platform products. Source |
| Security questionnaire answering | Yes | Dedicated 'Security Questionnaire Automation' product module. Source |
| Enterprise admin (SSO, SCIM, RBAC) | Partial | Basic SSO is listed on the entry Essentials tier, but SAML-based SSO is gated to the Plus and Premium tiers; no SCIM support is published; multi-workspace/sub-accounts are add-ons on higher tiers only. Source |
| SCIM 2.0 provisioning | Not established | Apptega's pricing table tiers SAML SSO explicitly, entry tier without it and Plus and Premium with it, but never names SCIM as a feature, an add-on or a gap. Absence from a table that is otherwise this specific is suggestive, but it is not a statement of absence. |
| Continuous control testing | Partial | Apptega brands itself around 'continuous compliance' and continuous monitoring of security status, but public pages describe assessment/scoring updates rather than confirmed automated, scheduled control tests. Source |
| Native multi-framework support | Partial | 'Framework Crosswalking' is an explicit, named core product ('Manage multi-framework programs as one'), meaning additional frameworks are cross-mapped off a shared control set rather than each getting a fully independent native control library. Source |
8 frameworks, and how well each is established.
A framework on a marketing page is a vendor claim, not a confirmed capability. We grade the difference rather than repeating the list.
| Framework | Evidence | Note |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | Vendor-claimed | FAQ: 'Apptega supports over 30 frameworks, including NIST, SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI, and more.' Source |
| ISO 27001 | Vendor-claimed | Source |
| CMMC | Vendor-claimed | Source |
| PCI DSS | Vendor-claimed | Source |
| HIPAA | Vendor-claimed | Source |
| NIST CSF | Vendor-claimed | Source |
| NIST 800-53 | Vendor-claimed | Source |
| NIST 800-171 | Vendor-claimed | Source |
Apptega does not publish a price.
Getting a number requires a sales conversation. Anything below comes from reported quotes or marketplace listings, and is labeled as such.
- Disclosure model
- Quote-based (reported from $6/user/month)
- Observed price (reported)
- USD 6 / user/month
- Basis
- Estimate, 2026-07-24
Auditor fees are separate from all of these. See the SOC 2 audit cost guide for what the audit itself runs.
Who actually issues the report.
Apptega is not an audit firm and does not issue SOC 2 reports; it is compliance-program software used either directly by an organization's in-house team preparing for an independently engaged CPA firm's SOC 2 audit, or by an MSSP/consulting partner managing that preparation on a client's behalf through Apptega's white-labeled, multi-tenant Partner Solutions Hub. No disclosed list of partnered audit (CPA) firms was found.
Software prepares you for the audit; a licensed CPA firm performs it and issues the report. If you have not picked a firm yet, we list independent SOC 2 auditors separately, and we are not one of them.
Who Apptega is for, and who it is not.
Good fit
An MSSP, MSP, or consulting firm that wants a white-labeled, multi-tenant platform to run compliance-as-a-service for many clients across several frameworks at once -- the product roadmap, partner program, and published case studies (Foresite, CyberSecOp, Evolve, Vistrada) are built heavily around that reseller motion.
Poor fit
A single company that only needs to pass one SOC 2 Type II audit as cheaply and automatically as possible should be cautious: independent MSP-practitioner commentary (Reddit r/msp) describes Apptega as built more for internal GRC/compliance teams than for lean MSP delivery, its published connector library (16+) is far smaller than SOC 2 specialists built around automated evidence pull, and pricing above the entry Essentials tier is quote-only rather than self-serve.
Typical buyer: A managed security/service provider (MSSP, MSP, or compliance consultancy) building a recurring, multi-client, multi-framework compliance practice, or a mid-market in-house security/compliance team juggling several overlapping frameworks who wants framework crosswalking rather than a single-framework tool..
Where every figure on this page came from.
9 sources, each with what it establishes and when we read it. If a claim here is out of date, this is the list that tells you which one to re-check.
- Pricing tiers (Essentials/Plus/Premium), feature gating including SSO vs. SAML-based SSO, and quote-only pricing above Essentials. https://www.apptega.com/pricing
- MSSP/MSP/consulting-firm positioning and framework count claim (30+ frameworks including SOC 2). https://www.apptega.com/solutions/security-providers
- Apptega's own trust/security page is hosted on Conveyor, a competing trust-center product, not a self-built module. https://security.apptega.com/
- Independent MSP practitioners describe Apptega as built more for internal GRC teams than for lean MSP delivery, compared to MSP-native tools. https://www.reddit.com/r/msp/comments/1tb84s7/compliance_scorecard_vs_apptega/
- G2 shows Apptega rated 4.7/5 from 157 verified reviews (retrieved via search snippet; direct G2 page crawl was blocked by a DataDome captcha). https://www.g2.com/sellers/apptega
- $15M growth capital (equity + debt) from Mainsail Partners, announced April 30, 2024. https://www.apptega.com/blog/apptega-funding-announcement-2024
- Mainsail Partners invested $37M in Apptega in an earlier growth round. https://www.msspalert.com/news/apptega-raises-37-million-further-engages-mssps-for-automated-cybersecurity-compliance
- Apptega has raised a total of $53.4M over 5 rounds since its first round on July 3, 2018. https://tracxn.com/d/companies/apptega/__mFgWizo0UhpVGjs3gOheTP1O-Q4xrQIY5j5zh0Ig9ik
- Lists a starting price of $6.00 per user per month (third-party aggregator figure, not confirmed on Apptega's own site). https://www.capterra.com/p/180590/Apptega/
← All SOC 2 compliance software · How we verify
Some links to compliance platforms on this page are affiliate links: if you sign up through one, the vendor may pay us a commission at no cost to you. It never changes our ranking, our review, or which platform we recommend.
1 fact on this page we could not establish.
Everything above renders with its evidence state, so a gap is visible rather than quietly filled in. If you work at Apptega, send us the sources and we will fill them.
Verification is free and always will be. It does not change where Apptega appears in any list on this site, what our reviews conclude, or which platform we recommend to a buyer. We only accept a correction that comes with a source we can check ourselves, and the source is published in the ledger above alongside the date.