Menu
Onspring SOC 2 compliance software
The previous out-of-scope rationale is stale. Current first-party product material explicitly lists SOC 2 as a supported framework and documents evidence collection, control testing and audit-response workflows.
By Peter Korpak, Lead Editor · independently researched · Methodology
- Pricing
- Quote-based
- Source-checked frameworks
- 2
- Integrations
- Onspring publishes a directory of native data, cybersecurity, financial-risk and regulatory-content integrations and provides an API, but no authoritative current total was found.
- G2 (2026-09-18)
- 4.7 · 80 reviews
The September 16, 2026 Trustero integration materially strengthens Onspring's automation story by adding continuous external-system evidence collection and re-testing. Keep the distinction that this continuous verification is provided through the Trustero integration rather than representing all-native Onspring functionality.
Capital IP made an initial strategic investment in Onspring in 2023 and an additional strategic investment in 2025, disclosed in July 2026. The amounts were not publicly disclosed.
What Onspring does.
Seven capabilities, graded the same way for every platform in the directory. "Not established" means we looked and could not confirm it, not that the feature is missing.
| Capability | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Automated evidence collection | Yes | Onspring's Evidence Locker automatically collects, stores and categorizes documents, data and other artifacts and allows evidence to be mapped to multiple audits. The September 2026 Trustero integration extends this with direct evidence pulls from cloud infrastructure, ticketing and identity systems. Source |
| Auditor workspace | Yes | Onspring Portal supports secure external-partner access, audit management and evidence gathering. Onspring separately documents an External Audit Portal use case where auditors receive tailored access to relevant records and workflows. Source |
| Trust center | Not established | No customer-facing security Trust Center or assurance-document sharing product comparable to Vanta Trust Center or SafeBase was established from current first-party material. |
| Security questionnaire answering | Not established | Onspring supports configurable surveys, assessments, attestations and questionnaires, but current first-party material reviewed did not establish inbound customer security-questionnaire response automation of the type captured by this dataset field. |
| Enterprise admin (SSO, SCIM, RBAC) | Partial | Onspring documents granular create/read/edit/delete access controls, role-based command centers and configurable user, role and group permissions in Portal. Its pricing tiers also support non-production, development and test environments. Current public evidence did not establish SCIM lifecycle provisioning, so the enterprise-admin roll-up remains partial. Source |
| SCIM 2.0 provisioning | Not established | No current public first-party documentation was found confirming SCIM account provisioning or deprovisioning. |
| Continuous control testing | Yes | The September 2026 Trustero integration runs AI agents continuously, pulls evidence from cloud infrastructure, ticketing and identity systems, maps it to controls already configured in Onspring and continuously re-tests those controls. Without Trustero, native Onspring still provides automated control-testing workflows, reminders and alerts but public material does not establish equivalent autonomous environment verification. Source |
| Native multi-framework support | Partial | Onspring explicitly promotes a 'Test Once, Satisfy Many' model in which one internal control and one set of evidence can be related to multiple regulatory or framework requirements. This is a shared/cross-mapped control model rather than evidence of completely independent control sets for each framework. Source |
2 frameworks checked individually, and how well each is established.
A framework on a marketing page is a vendor claim, not a confirmed capability. We grade the difference rather than repeating the list.
| Framework | Evidence | Note |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | Vendor-claimed | Onspring's current Compliance Management product explicitly lists SOC 2 alongside SOX, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, NIST and CMMC. Source |
| ISO 27001 | Vendor-claimed | ISO 27001 is explicitly named in the current Compliance Management product and controls can be mapped across multiple regulatory and framework requirements. Source |
Onspring uses quote-based pricing.
Getting a direct number requires a sales conversation. Anything below comes from reported quotes or marketplace listings, and is labeled as such.
- Disclosure model
- Quote-based
Software pricing alone does not establish the audit fee. A licensed CPA firm issues the SOC 2 report. A commercial offer may package coordination or the fee, so get the legal provider, deliverable, and amount in writing. See the SOC 2 audit cost guide for scope and budget context.
Who actually issues the report.
Onspring supports an External Audit Portal, restricted external-user access, evidence gathering, audit reports and corrective-action workflows. No current public evidence establishes an embedded SOC 2 CPA marketplace, and Onspring does not itself issue SOC 2 reports.
Software prepares you for the audit; a licensed CPA firm performs it and issues the report. If you have not picked a firm yet, we list independent SOC 2 auditors separately, and we are not one of them.
Who Onspring is for, and who it is not.
Good fit
Organizations that need configurable SOC 2 compliance inside a wider GRC, internal-audit, policy, risk or third-party-risk program and value no-code customization over a prescriptive checklist.
Poor fit
A very small first-time SOC 2 buyer looking for a highly opinionated wizard, transparent entry-level pricing and a bundled CPA marketplace with minimal implementation or administration.
Typical buyer: Mid-market and enterprise compliance, security, risk and internal-audit teams that want to design a SOC 2 program inside a flexible no-code GRC system and reuse the same controls, evidence and workflows across several frameworks..
Compare Onspring with three alternatives.
- Comp AI Sponsored
An engineering-led company that values an inspectable, self-hostable compliance platform and wants one vendor scope that can include guided implementation, a trust center, penetration testing, and audit coordination when quoted.
-
A growing SaaS company that wants deep, well-documented connectors on a mainstream stack, values interface polish and G2-rated support experience, and plans to run more than one framework over time.
-
Teams that want SOC 2 compliance automation and device management in one platform instead of pairing a compliance tool with a separate MDM.
Sources
If a claim on this page is out of date, this is the list to re-check.
| Establishes | Source | Retrieved |
|---|---|---|
| Current Compliance Management product explicitly supports SOC 2 and documents control libraries, cross-framework mapping, automated testing, integrated evidence collection, Evidence Locker reuse and compliance audit trails. | Onspring Vendor docs | |
| Current SOC 2 guide positions Onspring as software for automating SOC 2 assessments, centralizing controls, policies and test results, organizing audit evidence and maintaining audit readiness. | Onspring Vendor docs | |
| Onspring Portal supports secure external-partner collaboration, audit management and evidence gathering. | Onspring Vendor docs | |
| Onspring explicitly identifies External Audit Portal as a Portal use case and documents configurable user, role and group access for external participants including auditors. | Onspring Vendor docs | |
| September 16, 2026 announcement says the Trustero integration pulls evidence directly from cloud infrastructure, ticketing and identity systems, maps it to Onspring controls and continuously re-tests controls. | Onspring Vendor docs | |
| Platform documentation describes no-code workflows, scheduled surveys and questionnaires, task management, data relationships and granular user access controls. | Onspring Vendor docs | |
| Onspring publishes user-based, product-based and hybrid licensing structures plus Bronze through Platinum platform levels, but requires buyers to request a quote. | Onspring Vendor docs | |
| Implementation services use Onspring-certified consultants; Onspring publishes an average product implementation of 60 days and fastest implementation of 30 days. | Onspring Vendor docs | |
| Capital IP disclosed an additional strategic investment in Onspring made in 2025 following its initial investment in 2023. | Capital IP Investment Partners Press | |
| G2 listed Onspring at 4.7 out of 5 from 80 reviews when checked. | G2 Review platform | |
| Onspring publishes a directory of native integrations and provides an API planning path, but the page does not establish a single authoritative current integration count. | Onspring Vendor docs |
5 facts on this page we could not establish.
Everything above renders with its evidence state, so a gap is visible rather than quietly filled in. If you work at Onspring, send us the sources and we will fill them.
Verification is free and always will be. It does not change where Onspring appears in any list on this site, what our reviews conclude, or which platform we recommend to a buyer. We only accept a correction that comes with a source we can check ourselves, and the source is published in the sources list above alongside the date.