Logo Menu

Chiaro

Specialist Verified Austin, TX, USA
  • Licensed CPA firm — can issue (sign) a SOC 2 report
  • AICPA peer review: Enrolled · Verify at AICPA → (retrieved 2026-08-03)

Source: soc2auditors.org/auditors/chiaro/ · compiled and maintained by soc2auditors.org.

Type 1 cost
$2K–$6.66K confirmed
Type 2 cost
$3K–$8.51K confirmed
Timeline
2–3 weeks
Accreditations
5 listed

Chiaro is a specialist SOC 2 audit firm in Austin, TX, USA that charges $3K–$8.5K for Type II audits with 2–3 week fieldwork-to-report timelines. Founded in 2026, they hold 5 accreditations and specialize in AI, B2B SaaS, SaaS, and 3 more. Their pricing is below average compared to the specialist average of $20.2K–$59.6K.

Or compare with similar firms ↓

Free. Anonymous until you pick.

Pricing

How Much Does Chiaro Charge for SOC 2?

Estimated Type 1 and Type 2 ranges, placed against the broader specialist peer set. Numbers are directional; final pricing depends on scope, Trust Services Criteria, evidence quality, and observation period.

Type 1 cost
$2K–$6.66K
Type 2 cost
$3K–$8.51K
Timeline
2–3 wk
Team Size
2
Report Delivery
Type I in 2-3 weeks from kickoff to signed report; Type II issued about 2 weeks after the observation window closes
Response Time
Founder-led: the signing CPA runs every engagement directly, no junior handoff

Type 2 cost Pricing Position

$3K observed market span · est. $450K
Chiaro: $3K–$8.51K Specialist avg: $20.241K–$59.606K

Note: Pricing shown is estimated based on typical engagements. Use our SOC 2 cost calculator for a personalized estimate.

Timeline: The 2–3 week figure is the audit fieldwork-to-report window once evidence is ready, not the full engagement. A SOC 2 Type II also requires an observation period, typically 3–12 months depending on scope, before that window begins.

How this directory works: we are an independent directory. Firms can pay a flat fee for labeled placement on our lists; we take no cut of audit fees, and payment never changes a firm's rating or who we match a buyer with. How we make money →

Pricing context
99%

of Specialist firms charge more for Type II.

Timeline context
83%

of Specialist firms have longer minimum timelines.

Certifications
5

listed certifications. Tier average: 4.

Compare

Compare Chiaro with Similar Specialist Firms

Side-by-side pricing, timeline, and certification counts for the closest-priced peers in the specialist tier.

Chiaro Zero Day CPA Sponsored Consilium Labs Sage Audits Prescient Security Tempo Audits
Type II Cost $3K–$8.51K $7K–$10K $9.6K–$16.3K $12K–$20K $10K–$30K $10K–$30K
Type I Cost $2K–$6.66K $5K–$7K $6.75K–$13.5K $12K–$20K $5K–$35K $8K–$20K
Timeline 2–3 wk 2–6 wk2–6 wk5–7 wk2–6 wk2–6 wk
Team Size 2 25–3011–502–10200–5005–15
Certifications 5 243171
Founded 2026 20202020202420182022

This comparison may include sponsored firms, marked above — only where they're a relevant alternative. How we choose

About

Chiaro Industry Fit

For buyers in AI and B2B SaaS, Chiaro fits the specialist profile when timeline (2–3 weeks) and Type II pricing ($3K–$8.51K) align with what specialist firms typically deliver. Their 5 active accreditations, including CPA, SOC 2, extend that fit beyond pure SOC 2 into adjacent compliance frameworks.

Who Should Hire Chiaro?

Solo founders and AI-native startups of 1-20 people facing their first enterprise security review, particularly teams shipping with Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor who want readiness, evidence collection, and the audit to run inside the tools they already use. Teams above 20 are scoped individually.

What Makes Chiaro Different?

Chiaro is the trading brand of Y Assurance PLLC, a Texas-registered CPA firm (Firm Registration No. C12398) founded in 2026 by Yuanlun Yin, a dual-licensed CPA in California and Texas who spent five years at Deloitte leading more than thirty SOC 2 engagements across the US and Canada. Two things separate it from the rest of the low-cost end. First, the complete audit methodology is published under CC BY 4.0 at github.com/Chiaro-HQ/methodology: 86 controls, 355 test attributes mapped to 61 Trust Services Criteria, the evidence accepted against each, and the deviation rules with worked examples, released before the first engagement ran under it. Second, Type II testing defaults to complete populations rather than samples, so every change, termination, and access review in the observation window is tested, with completeness corroborated by recorded, re-runnable retrieval commands and reconciliation against an independent second source. Where full retrieval is genuinely impracticable a sampling lane applies, selection is derived deterministically from a hash of the banked population so neither firm nor client can steer or re-roll the draw, and the report discloses per control which lane ran. Pricing is a published grid rather than a quote: fees scale by team size, chosen trust criteria, and observation window, and the calculator producing those numbers runs publicly on the firm's own site. Buyers evaluating independence should note that the same legal entity sells the readiness and control-monitoring platform and signs the attestation. AICPA rules permit that combination with documented safeguards under ET 1.295.040, but unlike Thoropass (which separates the CPA work into Laika Compliance, LLC) or A-LIGN (a distinct assurance practice), there is no separate attest entity here.

Fit check

Is Chiaro Right for You?

  • You need an affordable first SOC 2 audit (starting from $3K)
  • You're on a tight deadline — they can start and deliver in as few as 2 weeks
  • You're in healthcare and need HIPAA-aware auditors
  • You're a SaaS company going through SOC 2 for the first time
  • You want a firm that focuses primarily on SOC 2 and compliance audits

Engage Chiaro

Visit Chiaro's website directly, or get an anonymous quote through us. Tell us your scope, Chiaro replies with a price, a timeline, and why they'd be a fit. Anonymous until you pick.

Expertise

Industries, certifications, and platforms.

Tags below are preserved as crawlable text because they drive industry, accreditation, and GRC-platform comparisons across firm pages.

What Industries Does Chiaro Serve?

6 industries. Specialist average: 6.

AI B2B SaaS SaaS Startups Technology Healthcare

What Certifications Does Chiaro Hold?

5 certifications. Specialist average: 4.

CPA Firm CPA AICPA AICPA Peer Review SOC 2

Audit Platform

Chiaro - proprietary MCP-native platform (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Grok Build)

Buyer questions

Chiaro SOC 2 Audit FAQ

Firm-specific answers generated from the directory record and preserved in FAQPage schema.

How much does a SOC 2 audit from Chiaro cost?

Chiaro SOC 2 Type I audits typically range from $2K to $6.66K. Type II audits range from $3K to $8.51K. This is below average for specialist firms — the specialist tier average is $20.241K–$59.606K. Final pricing depends on your organization's scope, number of trust service criteria, and system complexity.

How long does a SOC 2 audit take with Chiaro?

The 2–3 week range is Chiaro's audit execution and report-delivery window once evidence is available. It is the fieldwork-to-report window, not the full engagement. A SOC 2 Type II also requires an observation period, typically 3–12 months depending on scope, before that window begins, while a Type I is a point-in-time assessment with no observation period. Actual timelines depend on readiness, scope, and evidence availability. They offer accelerated timelines for organizations that are audit-ready.

What industries does Chiaro specialize in?

Chiaro has deep expertise in AI, B2B SaaS, SaaS, Startups, Technology, Healthcare. They are best suited for Solo founders and AI-native startups of 1-20 people facing their first enterprise security review, particularly teams shipping with Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor who want readiness, evidence collection, and the audit to run inside the tools they already use. Teams above 20 are scoped individually.

What accreditations does Chiaro hold?

Chiaro holds 5 accreditations: CPA Firm, CPA, AICPA, AICPA Peer Review, SOC 2.

What audit platform does Chiaro use?

Chiaro uses Chiaro - proprietary MCP-native platform (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Grok Build) for their audit engagements. Reports are delivered via Type I in 2-3 weeks from kickoff to signed report; Type II issued about 2 weeks after the observation window closes.

Is Chiaro a good SOC 2 auditor?

Chiaro is a specialist SOC 2 audit firm founded in 2026 with 0 years of experience. Chiaro is the trading brand of Y Assurance PLLC, a Texas-registered CPA firm (Firm Registration No. C12398) founded in 2026 by Yuanlun Yin, a dual-licensed CPA in California and Texas who spent five years at Deloitte leading more than thirty SOC 2 engagements across the US and Canada. Two things separate it from the rest of the low-cost end. First, the complete audit methodology is published under CC BY 4.0 at github.com/Chiaro-HQ/methodology: 86 controls, 355 test attributes mapped to 61 Trust Services Criteria, the evidence accepted against each, and the deviation rules with worked examples, released before the first engagement ran under it. Second, Type II testing defaults to complete populations rather than samples, so every change, termination, and access review in the observation window is tested, with completeness corroborated by recorded, re-runnable retrieval commands and reconciliation against an independent second source. Where full retrieval is genuinely impracticable a sampling lane applies, selection is derived deterministically from a hash of the banked population so neither firm nor client can steer or re-roll the draw, and the report discloses per control which lane ran. Pricing is a published grid rather than a quote: fees scale by team size, chosen trust criteria, and observation window, and the calculator producing those numbers runs publicly on the firm's own site. Buyers evaluating independence should note that the same legal entity sells the readiness and control-monitoring platform and signs the attestation. AICPA rules permit that combination with documented safeguards under ET 1.295.040, but unlike Thoropass (which separates the CPA work into Laika Compliance, LLC) or A-LIGN (a distinct assurance practice), there is no separate attest entity here. They are best suited for organizations that need ai, b2b saas, saas expertise.

Where is Chiaro located?

Chiaro is headquartered in Austin, TX, USA. They serve clients across the United States and can conduct SOC 2 audits remotely.

How does Chiaro compare to other specialist SOC 2 auditors?

Compared to the 69 specialist firms in our directory, Chiaro's SOC 2 Type II pricing ($3K–$8.51K) is below average (tier average: $20.241K–$59.606K). They hold 5 certifications vs. the tier average of 4. Their minimum timeline of 2 weeks is faster than the tier average.

Who should hire Chiaro for a SOC 2 audit?

Chiaro is best suited for Solo founders and AI-native startups of 1-20 people facing their first enterprise security review, particularly teams shipping with Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor who want readiness, evidence collection, and the audit to run inside the tools they already use. Teams above 20 are scoped individually. Their key differentiator is: Chiaro is the trading brand of Y Assurance PLLC, a Texas-registered CPA firm (Firm Registration No. C12398) founded in 2026 by Yuanlun Yin, a dual-licensed CPA in California and Texas who spent five years at Deloitte leading more than thirty SOC 2 engagements across the US and Canada. Two things separate it from the rest of the low-cost end. First, the complete audit methodology is published under CC BY 4.0 at github.com/Chiaro-HQ/methodology: 86 controls, 355 test attributes mapped to 61 Trust Services Criteria, the evidence accepted against each, and the deviation rules with worked examples, released before the first engagement ran under it. Second, Type II testing defaults to complete populations rather than samples, so every change, termination, and access review in the observation window is tested, with completeness corroborated by recorded, re-runnable retrieval commands and reconciliation against an independent second source. Where full retrieval is genuinely impracticable a sampling lane applies, selection is derived deterministically from a hash of the banked population so neither firm nor client can steer or re-roll the draw, and the report discloses per control which lane ran. Pricing is a published grid rather than a quote: fees scale by team size, chosen trust criteria, and observation window, and the calculator producing those numbers runs publicly on the firm's own site. Buyers evaluating independence should note that the same legal entity sells the readiness and control-monitoring platform and signs the attestation. AICPA rules permit that combination with documented safeguards under ET 1.295.040, but unlike Thoropass (which separates the CPA work into Laika Compliance, LLC) or A-LIGN (a distinct assurance practice), there is no separate attest entity here.

Discovery call

Questions to Ask Chiaro Before Hiring

A buyer-side checklist. Bring these to your first call — the answers separate firms that have run hundreds of SOC 2 engagements from firms that are bidding on them.

  1. Your team is sized at 2. How many auditors will be assigned to my engagement, and who is the engagement lead — a partner, a senior manager, or a staff auditor?
  2. You quote 2–3 weeks. What pushes a project to the longer end of that range, and what does "audit-ready on day one" look like to you?
  3. Your Type 2 cost range is $3K–$8.51K. What's included at each end, and what scope changes would push pricing above the top of that range?
  4. We've talked to similar firms in the specialist tier. What's a question buyers like us should be asking that they usually don't?
  5. Who reviews and signs the report on your side — is that a partner-level CPA, and how involved are they during fieldwork versus only at sign-off?
  6. How do you handle subservice carve-outs (e.g., AWS, GCP, Azure) versus inclusive subservice organizations when defining our scope?
  7. When you find an issue mid-audit, what's your remediation cadence — same-day flagging, weekly checkpoints, or an end-of-fieldwork rollup?
  8. Do you have surge windows (e.g., Q4 financial-year close) when start dates slip, and how far in advance do we need to lock the engagement to avoid them?
Verification

Chiaro on the verification record

We independently verified Chiaro's CPA standing and peer-review record. The facts and dates are on its verification record.

See the verification record · Is this your firm? Get your badge.

Quote

Get a quote from Chiaro

Tell us your scope. Chiaro replies with a price, a timeline, and why they'd be a fit. Anonymous until you pick.

Want to compare first? See 69 similar specialist firms or get 3 quotes.

We send you 3 to 5 firms that actually fit, a shortlist, not a phone book.

What do you need? Select all that apply

We email you the quotes. Firms don't see your contact details until you choose one.

Optional. Up to 2,000 characters.

Add optional details timeline, platform, frameworks
Other frameworks your customers ask about

Compare options before taking a sales call.

Every request is read by a human before anything goes out.

Run an audit firm? See how firms get found and shortlisted here — how it works → / Verify Chiaro's profile →