Menu
Delve Pricing: What a Quote Must Show
We do not have a source-dated Delve list price or observed customer quote that meets our publication standard. Delve is not a record in our current GRC vendor pricing dataset, so this page does not publish a Delve price range. An absent number is unknown, not zero, free, cheap, or expensive.
We take no money from Delve. Delve has no paid placement, referral relationship, or commercial influence on this page. We would rather leave the price unknown than turn an unsupported claim into a buying signal.
The practical answer for a buyer is to request an itemized proposal, separate software from the independent audit, and compare the same scope across vendors. This page gives you the structure for doing that without pretending we have pricing evidence we do not have.
Recent developments
In March 2026, an anonymous Substack account called DeepDelver, describing itself as a former Delve customer, alleged that Delve fabricated SOC 2 and ISO 27001 reports for roughly 494 client companies, citing a leaked spreadsheet and near-identical boilerplate audit language. TechCrunch, Inc., and The Economic Times, among others, covered the allegations. Delve disputed the claims, calling the post misleading, and said customers can choose their own accredited independent auditor, that its pre-filled policies and templates are not fabricated evidence, and that the leaked spreadsheet went public in error. In early April 2026, Y Combinator removed Delve from its startup directory and the two parted ways. As of this writing, the allegations remain publicly disputed with no announced legal resolution.
We are not in a position to adjudicate this dispute, and we do not try to here. It illustrates why this page insists a quote name the licensed CPA firm performing the audit: software claims about compliance status are not the same as an independent auditor’s opinion, and a buyer can verify the latter regardless of what any platform states. See how to check whether a SOC 2 report is real for that process.
How much does Delve cost?
We do not have a source-dated Delve list price or observed quote that meets our publication standard. Delve is absent from our current GRC vendor pricing dataset, so we will not invent a range or repeat an unsupported number as fact.
Delve pricing evidence status
| Evidence type | What we can publish | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Public list price | No source-dated figure in our reviewed set | Unknown |
| Observed customer quote | No attributable observation in our dataset | Unknown |
| Estimated annual range | No evidence-backed range prepared | Not published |
| Monthly equivalent | Cannot calculate without an annual figure | Not calculated |
This table is deliberately sparse. Search results, sales conversations, and third-party articles can contain numbers, but a number becomes useful only when its source, scope, and date are clear. We have not met that threshold for Delve.
If Delve supplies a quote, treat it as evidence for your company only. A private proposal may depend on company size, frameworks, systems, support, and contract terms. It does not automatically establish a public price for every buyer.
Does Delve publish list pricing?
Our reviewed source set contains no Delve public price list that we can cite. That describes the evidence available to this page, not a claim that Delve has never disclosed a price in any context.
Public pricing and observed pricing are different evidence types. A public rate card can show a standard offer, but it may omit negotiated terms or services. An observed quote shows what one buyer was offered, but it may not generalize. We currently have neither in a form we can publish responsibly for Delve.
The right next step is not to infer a price from category averages. Ask Delve for a written proposal tied to your exact systems and compliance scope, then compare it with the source-dated vendor bands in our SOC 2 software pricing comparison.
Does SOC2 Auditors receive money from Delve?
We take no money from Delve. Delve has no paid placement, referral relationship, or commercial influence on this page. We apply the same evidence standard to Delve pricing that we apply to every other vendor.
That policy is part of the answer because pricing coverage creates an obvious incentive to favor a vendor with attractive commercial terms. Delve cannot pay to gain a price claim, a recommendation, or a more favorable position here. If stronger evidence becomes available, we can update the page without changing that relationship.
What should a Delve quote include?
A usable Delve quote should identify the subscription term, frameworks, connected systems, onboarding, support, usage limits, optional services, renewal rules, and exclusions. Keep the independent audit fee separate so competing proposals cover the same scope.
Copy every proposal into one comparison sheet:
| Quote field | What to record | Question to resolve |
|---|---|---|
| Platform term | Start, end, and cancellation terms | How long is the commitment? |
| Framework scope | Every included framework | Is added scope priced separately? |
| Systems | Native connections and manual evidence | What remains internal work? |
| Onboarding | Deliverables, owner, and timeline | Is implementation included? |
| Support | Channel, response target, and named help | What happens when evidence fails? |
| Usage limits | Users, entities, tests, or questionnaires | What can trigger an overage? |
| Renewal | Notice, uplift, and scope assumptions | What can change after year one? |
| Audit | CPA firm, fee, and separate engagement | Who issues the report? |
Do not accept “included” as the final description of a material service. Ask what the deliverable is, who performs it, when it is due, and what happens if the scope changes.
How should buyers compare Delve with alternatives?
Compare Delve on the same frameworks, systems, service depth, audit arrangement, contract term, and renewal assumptions as every alternative. A lower headline quote can cost more when it excludes onboarding, evidence work, support, or the independent audit.
Begin with the SOC 2 software directory to define a shortlist, then use the pricing comparison to identify vendors with source-dated bands. Do not paste a category average into the blank Delve row. Keep “unknown” visible until the quote answers it.
A useful comparison has three totals: first-year external spend, likely renewal spend, and internal labor. This prevents a broad service package from being compared with software alone and prevents a cheaper license from hiding extensive manual work.
Is Delve worth the quoted price?
Delve is worth considering only if the proposal’s evidence automation, support, and contract terms solve your actual compliance workload at a defensible total cost. Without a verified public price, value must be judged against the written scope and a live product demonstration.
Give Delve a representative control and ask the team to show the full path from connected system to auditor-ready evidence. Test a missing or failing item, not only the clean dashboard state. Then ask the intended auditor whether the export and evidence trail fit its testing process.
The decision should follow that proof, the itemized quote, and matched alternatives. A vendor’s sales narrative cannot substitute for contract language or an auditor’s acceptance of the evidence format.
What is the auditor’s view of Delve pricing?
An auditor does not approve a software purchase or judge whether its price is fair. The auditor evaluates controls and evidence independently. Compliance software may organize evidence, but a licensed CPA firm must perform the examination and issue the SOC 2 report.
Ask the CPA firm which evidence Delve can export, which tests still require manual support, and whether the proposed workflow preserves access to original records. Keep the CPA engagement and fee separate unless the contracts clearly identify the independent firm and each party’s responsibilities.