Logo Menu

Multi-framework GRC / compliance operations platform with dedicated SOC 2 support Β· verified

Hyperproof

Hyperproof's marketing and case studies (Appian managing 28 frameworks, a 22,000-employee organization, Thales) consistently point at teams running concurrent multi-framework compliance programs rather than a company doing its first SOC 2 audit.

Its 2025 HyperComply-powered trust center and questionnaire automation are real, shipped capabilities, not roadmap items, per an independent PR Newswire release. Pricing is quote-only, and the third-party-reported Vendr range runs well above what typical first-time SOC 2 buyers pay for a dedicated point solution.

Registry maintained by Peter Korpak Method: Sourced desk research Verified Methodology

Every figure below carries its source and the date we retrieved it.

Capabilities

What Hyperproof does.

Seven capabilities, graded the same way for every platform in the directory. "Not established" means we looked and could not confirm it, not that the feature is missing.

CapabilityStatusEvidence
Automated evidence collection Yes Product page: 'Automate evidence collection for SOC 2 audit... avoid duplicating work.' Source
Auditor workspace Yes Product page describes task assignment/review workflows and dashboards built around audit preparation and auditor requests. Source
Trust center Yes April 28, 2025 press release: HyperComply-powered trust management adds branded, public trust centers. Source
Security questionnaire answering Yes Same release: AI-assisted security questionnaire response, claiming 71% faster responses and 92% autofill accuracy, via the acquired HyperComply product. Source
Enterprise admin (SSO, SCIM, RBAC) Partial Product page confirms SSO, multi-factor authentication, and roles/permissions. We found no explicit confirmation of SCIM provisioning, so we mark this partial rather than yes. Source
SCIM 2.0 provisioning Yes Documented SCIM provisioning with an endpoint and bearer token, via Okta or Entra. No tier restriction is mentioned, and Hyperproof publishes no tiers at all, so there is no named plan structure to gate against. Source
Continuous control testing Not established Vendor uses 'continuous compliance' marketing language, but we found no specific claim of scheduled, automated recurring control tests as distinct from continuous evidence collection.
Native multi-framework support Partial Vendor's own FAQ: 'Hyperproof's multi-framework mapping helps teams apply existing [SOC 2] controls across multiple frameworks like ISO 27001, GDPR, NIST CSF... and more,' i.e. a shared/crosswalked control model, not fully separate native control sets per framework. Source
Frameworks

2 frameworks, and how well each is established.

A framework on a marketing page is a vendor claim, not a confirmed capability. We grade the difference rather than repeating the list.

FrameworkEvidenceNote
SOC 2 Vendor-claimed Dedicated SOC 2 product page with an out-of-the-box program template. Source
ISO 27001 Vendor-claimed Same page markets crosswalking SOC 2 controls to ISO 27001 and other frameworks. Source
Pricing

Hyperproof does not publish a price.

Getting a number requires a sales conversation. Anything below comes from reported quotes or marketplace listings, and is labeled as such.

Disclosure model
Quote-based (reported $22K–$70K/yr)
Observed range (reported)
USD 22,160–70,000 / year
Basis
Estimate, 2026-07-24

Auditor fees are separate from all of these. See the SOC 2 audit cost guide for what the audit itself runs.

Auditor handoff

Who actually issues the report.

Hyperproof is a compliance-operations platform, not an audit firm, and does not issue the SOC 2 report. A licensed CPA firm performs the actual audit and uses Hyperproof's evidence-request and audit-management workspace to review the evidence the buyer has collected.

Software prepares you for the audit; a licensed CPA firm performs it and issues the report. If you have not picked a firm yet, we list independent SOC 2 auditors separately, and we are not one of them.

Fit

Who Hyperproof is for, and who it is not.

Good fit

A company already managing multiple frameworks (for example SOC 2 plus ISO 27001 or NIST) that wants one shared-control system instead of separate point tools for each audit.

Poor fit

A first-time SOC 2 buyer with a single framework and a small team. Hyperproof's own FAQ explicitly contrasts itself with vendors 'solely focused on SOC 2 requirements,' and the $22,160-$70,000/year range we found (Vendr, third-party reported) sits well above the entry-tier pricing that single-framework SOC 2 tools charge.

Typical buyer: Mid-market to enterprise organizations with a standing GRC function running several compliance frameworks and audits at once..

Source ledger

Where every figure on this page came from.

7 sources, each with what it establishes and when we read it. If a claim here is out of date, this is the list that tells you which one to re-check.

← All SOC 2 compliance software Β· Hyperproof review Β· How we verify

Some links to compliance platforms on this page are affiliate links: if you sign up through one, the vendor may pay us a commission at no cost to you. It never changes our ranking, our review, or which platform we recommend.

For Hyperproof

1 fact on this page we could not establish.

Everything above renders with its evidence state, so a gap is visible rather than quietly filled in. If you work at Hyperproof, send us the sources and we will fill them.

Verification is free and always will be. It does not change where Hyperproof appears in any list on this site, what our reviews conclude, or which platform we recommend to a buyer. We only accept a correction that comes with a source we can check ourselves, and the source is published in the ledger above alongside the date.

Correct this record